and capitalism for that matter

false its reactionary to communism

I won't deny that

Fascism had a hybrid true capitalist model versus (((CAPITALISM)))

mfw at the impasse of my evening, current drink level slows me down but further drinks will facilitate so I must bear this burden

anything that even uses the word capital unironically is marxist and should be ceased

yeah false unless you like having absolutely no edge in anything engineering, business, or any other vector

germany didn't have king tigers by chance

https://twitter.com/JoeWatson1414/status/888222175177711616

capital itself is a flawed understanding of the material world

or panthers et al

you view capitalism in the wrong vein

you may not have money to do a business yourself others do and are gathering resources you invest as part of it and are rewarded with your surplus

Hobbes metaphysical pronouncement that all life is matter in motion implies heavily that he's a materialistic determinist. Not central to the good things he writes but uses enlightenment scientific ideas as the basis for his political reflections. I like him to a point, but he has his failings.

The problem is when your capital becomes something "worthwile" in and of itself

so you shouldnt get tangible assets

wtf

resources are not meaningful outside of their ability to sustain life

you some kind of commie faggot

yes they are lmao

not necessary is a better word

they generate further ability to operate and expand what you want in life from business to family

material expansion is the wrong kind of striving

in a metaphysical sense of course

Material expansion allows a society to have greater power than rival societies

nothing wrong with just living ur life

From an a prior standpoint they don't have intrinsic value as they're presumed. They're benefit derives from their use. In this context, capitalism =/= commerce and industry but something more specific.

you keep viewing this as a material expenditure due to your personal use

^^^^

a true capitalist reinvests in further items that generate revenue not a fucking material piece of shit brand name

@Mayor of Fashtown if you are defining your society solely upon its power and its material expanse then you are doing it wrong

there's ground for agreement between both positions.

So much this @Vanguard

@Moosey its not a zero sum game

there is a middle ground but its being framed incorrectly assuming that you invest buy yo nigga ass some ray bans or something

If we define the act of expansion itself as something to strive for then collapse is inevitable

From a philosophical position you're describing maybe mercantilism or commercial enterprise rather than capitalism itself though.

Expansion and acquisition of resources for the in group is the heart of nature itself

why is it inevitable?

There is a fine line between the natural survival need and greed

@skooks I'm speaking historically