It's a fucking catastrophe and the anger and conflict between the sexes is relentlessly amplified.

Pin this?

I found myself once on a date with a British woman who was 26yo (myself being 27). She was a solid 7 out of 10. At the time, I was working a financial audit job for a big 4 accounting firm. As such, I had very little time for anything social. Despite my heavy reservations, I jumped on tinder as it solved the time problem (though evidently not the quality problem as we're about to see).

Anyway, this girl was blonde and blue-eyed and had come from the countryside where she had led a relatively sheltered life. She was working as a manager for nurses who visit the elderly in homes (she had previously been working as such a nurse herself). So we went on a date.

I have found subtle ways of enquiring as to who a girl has been with in the past and what her sexual history might be like. I managed to discover that this particular girl had burned the coal having moved from the countryside to London. She was even proud of it. Her explanation was 'well it's not unusual given London is a multicultural city'.

Suffice it to say there was no second date.

Bizarrely enough however, she was anti-islam and anti-Sharia law so there was that but my over-riding thought? 'I'm not venturing where the groid has planted his flag (so-to-speak) before me'.

@MartelMosley Yes Martel I am daring to speak of all women.

Why do you think giving them more crap they didn't have when they had lots of kids will make them have kids again?

Where is your evidence?

The only thing we should expect to work is approximating the conditions of when we last had success.

Who is giving them more crap? I'm certainly not advocating for it. Like I said, by giving them minority status, you enable giving them more for nothing. Who pushes for equating them to an oppressed minority? (((Who indeed)))...

That was the whole exchange... I was saying they didn't used to have to publicly breastfeed everywhere and I doubt letting them will make them have more kids.

https://youtu.be/I0pgd7xRpew

You were saying something about giving them greater comforts so they'll have more kids.

looks like the ship is no longer detained, and sailing towards its mission to interept muslims and take them back to africa, and to sink empty boats the smugglers leave out overnight.

@Lester Cordell re-read what I wrote. I said breastfeeding in public (which is currently legal so not giving them anything new) is perfectly natural and acceptable. I said that we should make them feel comfortable in having more children. I'm not espousing giving them more of anything that doesn't aid that objective.

Would they have felt comfortable flopping a tit out in 1900?

I doubt it. But they had 12 kids.

probably given that pre-war German posters show just that

What they need is less options, to do what they are told

Frankly I see the public breast-feeding thing as just a shit test. How often do you even see white women with children?

Personally, I rarely see that.

you asked about the 1900s...

1900s was a rhetorical example. I'll grant you that you've shown me it was common then in some places but my point is that they got by without having to do it at a time when they had lots of kids. I think that is true, isn't it?

Here's what I think: the breastfeeding debate was put out there by the media (in the UK at least) to make a big deal out of something that was of little consequence and was virtually a non-issue. Why was this done? To antagonise both the male and female side of the equation so that they would be further divided. This would support the pro-third wave feminist issue and the angry/anxious side of men that generally repels women (see above) thus driving the wedge between us even further which ultimately serves to drive down birth rates. It is part of a multi-faceted attack on male-female relationships, communication and understanding (other examples include purposeful gender confusion, the wage gap myth, the campus rape culture myth, etc).

THIS ULTIMATELY SERVES TO LOWER WHITE BIRTH RATES.

Personally, I think a lot of women don't breastfeed in public precisely because they don't like the idea of displaying themselves and an intimate connection between mother and child. men don't like it for almost precisely the same reason (plus it can be viewed as a gratuitous display of course). Who pushes the idea that woman can, and therefore SHOULD, breastfeed in public (therefore prompting antagony and friction between both sides)? (((Who))) indeed...

I can agree with all of that.

I'm glad.

> they don't like the idea of displaying themselves and an intimate connection between mother and child
TO FOREIGNERS

ethnic harmony is destroyed

this wouldnt be an issue in an all white village

new TRS layout is up

Again, I'll use the UK as an example as it is what I know; males hailing from the third world commit a disproportionate amount of the sexual crime. The media relays this to the public as being purely a 'male' problem and overlooks the foreign element completely. Thus, they drive the wedge even further. Who controls the media? (((Who))) indeed...

the paywall asks for too many personal details for my liking...

the more i look into the UK the more i like and understand the chinese version of harmony

those rice jews are on to something

We may well have had the Industrial Revolution first, but we'll have the Racial Revolution last it seems...

The idea that our society is now so inextricably intertwined with multiculturalism, that removing it would be tantamount to removing a vital organ, pervades amongst our people like air...

i just dont know why jews and liberals/commies/antiwhites are pushing us into racial conflict that much, this will make us fight for survival

and when ever whites fight for survival they win