Message from @Lester Cordell

Discord ID: 339347611725070347


2017-07-25 08:53:33 UTC  

in the case of women, I'm not sure the numbers really matter. they're told they have minority status (wage gap, sexism, etc)

2017-07-25 08:53:51 UTC  

my point being is that Lester tells us they give us fewer and fewer children

2017-07-25 08:54:09 UTC  

as men, we need to be choosing White women who want kids

2017-07-25 08:54:13 UTC  

and producing as many as possible

2017-07-25 08:54:22 UTC  

Exactly.

2017-07-25 08:54:53 UTC  

Choose women with good features that wants to have at least 3 kids.

2017-07-25 08:55:11 UTC  

That's a starter

2017-07-25 08:57:37 UTC  

And you have to keep giving her very subtle redpills, so by the time you are married she should be somewhat based compared to normies.

2017-07-25 09:09:44 UTC  

I agree

2017-07-25 09:10:07 UTC  

It's a complex situation with many variables involved.

2017-07-25 09:14:30 UTC  

On the female side of the equation you have:
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women having several children is selfish.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that having kids takes up your time better spent having fun, travelling, drinking, experimenting, etc.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that settling down with a man and a family prevents their sexual liberation and their capacity to 'try every flavour' with an (((accent))) on the 'exotic'.
- Third-wave feminist propaganda telling women that their time is better spent in the boardroom and treating men as inferior.
- Rising costs which make women anxious as to how they will fund child-raising. They are therefore all in competition for the richer men of which the % is dwindling.
- Etc.

2017-07-25 09:17:04 UTC  

On the male side:
- Wage compression making it harder to support a family and present yourself to women as a viable life partner for child-raising.
- Rising anger and anxiety over the current situation and life in general making them less appealing targets for women who are used to seeing laid-back, carefree men on the TV, in magazines, etc.
- Rising anger against women promulgated by (((them))) to divide us. This is done by (((their))) support of third-wave feminism. Despondency is also an issue.
- Competing for the few women who are racially minded AND want kids (although the two tend to go hand-in-hand).
- Etc.

2017-07-25 09:18:51 UTC  

It's a fucking catastrophe and the anger and conflict between the sexes is relentlessly amplified.

2017-07-25 09:19:07 UTC  

Pin this?

2017-07-25 09:27:44 UTC  

I found myself once on a date with a British woman who was 26yo (myself being 27). She was a solid 7 out of 10. At the time, I was working a financial audit job for a big 4 accounting firm. As such, I had very little time for anything social. Despite my heavy reservations, I jumped on tinder as it solved the time problem (though evidently not the quality problem as we're about to see).

Anyway, this girl was blonde and blue-eyed and had come from the countryside where she had led a relatively sheltered life. She was working as a manager for nurses who visit the elderly in homes (she had previously been working as such a nurse herself). So we went on a date.

I have found subtle ways of enquiring as to who a girl has been with in the past and what her sexual history might be like. I managed to discover that this particular girl had burned the coal having moved from the countryside to London. She was even proud of it. Her explanation was 'well it's not unusual given London is a multicultural city'.

Suffice it to say there was no second date.

Bizarrely enough however, she was anti-islam and anti-Sharia law so there was that but my over-riding thought? 'I'm not venturing where the groid has planted his flag (so-to-speak) before me'.

2017-07-25 09:57:57 UTC  

@MartelMosley Yes Martel I am daring to speak of all women.

2017-07-25 09:58:20 UTC  

Why do you think giving them more crap they didn't have when they had lots of kids will make them have kids again?

2017-07-25 09:58:39 UTC  

Where is your evidence?

2017-07-25 09:59:35 UTC  

The only thing we should expect to work is approximating the conditions of when we last had success.

2017-07-25 10:05:00 UTC  

Who is giving them more crap? I'm certainly not advocating for it. Like I said, by giving them minority status, you enable giving them more for nothing. Who pushes for equating them to an oppressed minority? (((Who indeed)))...

2017-07-25 10:06:15 UTC  

That was the whole exchange... I was saying they didn't used to have to publicly breastfeed everywhere and I doubt letting them will make them have more kids.

2017-07-25 10:06:17 UTC  
2017-07-25 10:06:41 UTC  

You were saying something about giving them greater comforts so they'll have more kids.

2017-07-25 10:06:51 UTC  

looks like the ship is no longer detained, and sailing towards its mission to interept muslims and take them back to africa, and to sink empty boats the smugglers leave out overnight.

2017-07-25 10:07:55 UTC  

@Lester Cordell re-read what I wrote. I said breastfeeding in public (which is currently legal so not giving them anything new) is perfectly natural and acceptable. I said that we should make them feel comfortable in having more children. I'm not espousing giving them more of anything that doesn't aid that objective.

2017-07-25 10:08:26 UTC  

Would they have felt comfortable flopping a tit out in 1900?

2017-07-25 10:08:39 UTC  

I doubt it. But they had 12 kids.

2017-07-25 10:08:52 UTC  

probably given that pre-war German posters show just that

2017-07-25 10:11:19 UTC  

What they need is less options, to do what they are told

2017-07-25 10:12:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/274262571367006208/339349080394170369/4f420c89b32b5fb26e549c46bc4e7666--breastfeeding-art-french-resistance.jpg

2017-07-25 10:12:06 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/274262571367006208/339349082612957186/48fce911e4e19330faa8811fecd7f2e3--breastfeeding-art-breastfeeding-support.jpg

2017-07-25 10:12:06 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/274262571367006208/339349085137928202/84311a392002e8e9da2cf690bb0e9ad5--breastfeeding-art-post-impressionism.jpg

2017-07-25 10:12:07 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/274262571367006208/339349089089093632/e6c6c9ac7db2dc926bb14f3373d4e79c--breastfeeding-images-breastfeeding-week.jpg

2017-07-25 10:12:22 UTC  

Frankly I see the public breast-feeding thing as just a shit test. How often do you even see white women with children?

2017-07-25 10:12:33 UTC  

Personally, I rarely see that.

2017-07-25 10:12:44 UTC  

you asked about the 1900s...

2017-07-25 10:13:41 UTC  

1900s was a rhetorical example. I'll grant you that you've shown me it was common then in some places but my point is that they got by without having to do it at a time when they had lots of kids. I think that is true, isn't it?

2017-07-25 10:18:29 UTC  

Here's what I think: the breastfeeding debate was put out there by the media (in the UK at least) to make a big deal out of something that was of little consequence and was virtually a non-issue. Why was this done? To antagonise both the male and female side of the equation so that they would be further divided. This would support the pro-third wave feminist issue and the angry/anxious side of men that generally repels women (see above) thus driving the wedge between us even further which ultimately serves to drive down birth rates. It is part of a multi-faceted attack on male-female relationships, communication and understanding (other examples include purposeful gender confusion, the wage gap myth, the campus rape culture myth, etc).

THIS ULTIMATELY SERVES TO LOWER WHITE BIRTH RATES.

2017-07-25 10:21:19 UTC  

Personally, I think a lot of women don't breastfeed in public precisely because they don't like the idea of displaying themselves and an intimate connection between mother and child. men don't like it for almost precisely the same reason (plus it can be viewed as a gratuitous display of course). Who pushes the idea that woman can, and therefore SHOULD, breastfeed in public (therefore prompting antagony and friction between both sides)? (((Who))) indeed...

2017-07-25 10:21:55 UTC  

I can agree with all of that.

2017-07-25 10:22:03 UTC  

I'm glad.