Message from @Troye
Discord ID: 657110776967856168
@Cobra Commander - If anyone tries to refute Biden's sons implication, just ask if they've bothered to read the Horowitz report
Ask if they have read any report \
i'll keep that in mind should it ever come up
If the roles were reversed Biden would be way more guilty than Trump. Roles as in who was president. Its a shame how focused the country has been on impeachment when there are actual real world problems that need to be dealt with. Its a depressing waste of time
they'll probably just reply with a derisive ad hominem tangent though lmao
Exactly. If you had a Republican House and Biden as President, the withholding of military aid to Ukraine to fire a "corrupt prosecutor" investigating a company within *his own country* where Biden's son was collecting 82k a month would be immediate grounds for investigation and impeachment.
@Mersenne Thanks for providing a source to go off of btw. Will try to give it a read
Note - The Horowitz report is more eye-opening on the illigitimate origins of the Steele Dossier, prompting FISA warrants from overhearing bar conversations, which prompted the Russia investigation.
Sounds like a long tedious read
No, it's pretty damn concise
Oh nice
*Correction - the unabridged report is a grueling 416 pages. It's worth reading the summary of findings.
Also, just read up. Most "journalism" today is journalistic malpractice
summary of the Horowitz report?
Yeah, I'd probably drive off a cliff before I finished the 400 pages
Rolling Stone gives the best TLDR
Basically, highlights the baseless claims used for issuing FISA warrants to monitor Trump and US citizens
That's really useful. Saving it to my news folder
Btw does anyone have a link to something showing where Trump can still run in 2020 once he's acquitted. Either a news article or something referencing laws. Can't find a good source
he can still run
clinton ran again after being acquitted
and won
if i remember correctly
Yeah, dizzy and Louis updated me earlier. Just trying to find a link that I can reference
I learned it in high school tbh
It should be common knownledge
You would be surprised how civics courses are absent from modern curriculum
Thanks, thats pretty helpful
Also - it's a rather specific question that *shouldn't* come up that often
Other than the pay line to read most of it
I'm sure I learned it at some point
pay line?
WSJ allows you to read 1-3 articles free every 24 hrs
After that, pay wall
Just forgot a lot of stuff due to a wild early twenties
I think I maxed out my 3
my civics was mostly how to interact with police, and what exactly they are and are not allowed to do under N-number of circumstances