?

@Samaritan™ Consent is about something to which you have rights. You don't have a right to someone else's private property in the first place.

Imagine thinking you have a right to others' private property and then calling me a leftist instead

did he just dodge that question? at least stand for your positions...

Is it possible for someone under 18 to consent though? @Thermonuclear

@Greasy >What is there is a monopoly?
I don't see a problem in that

They are having trouble 'bleaching' BKP content from #palaestra_debates

See he is totally a leftist

Real ancaps say that there wouldn't be a monopoly without state intervention

He's definitely trying to discredit the banner he flies under.

Lol.

I'm not an ancap and I know that

Well if you're saying Twitter and co are just private corps and not public platforms they should be regulated to uphold the American constitution, since they actively censor and stop information they dont like from reaching Billions of people

@Samaritan™ Leftists have a problem with monopoly. They want to use the state to break them. Libertarians don't care about monopolies, they are a result of the efficiency of the rational actor.

The fact that he won't say no to can kids consent disturbs me

>monopolies
>efficiency

lmao

Libertarians think monopolies are only formed because of state intervention

@Jeremy So far I have only received bad faith ramblings and ad homs, not a single response to any of my arguments

Thus it cannot be a monopoly, because they are simply more efficient. The use of force is required to prevent market entry, @Thermonuclear.

@Samaritan™ No, that is a cucked position. The true position is that it is irrelevant whether monopolies are formed or not.

He's not a real Libertarian.

You are a leftists caricature of what a libertarian is

McDonald's having a monopoly because of their caliber is not something that should be punished

That's not a monopoly.

You are advocating for punishing success and have the gall to call me a leftist

Neither is Walmart.

Nor is Amazon.

still dodging the consent question <:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>

>Well if you're saying Twitter and co are just private corps and not public platforms they should be regulated to uphold the American constitution, since they actively censor and stop information they dont like from reaching Billions of people
@Ethreen42 I'm against regulations.

Why can't he just say no kids can't consent

McDonalds should be regulated, they actively promote fat diets to billions of people that lead to a unhealthy and degenerate society

Now, I will say, price floors on labor benefit firms of economic scale, yes.

That prevents small businesses from competing against them.

No one is forcing you to use Twitter

Multiple corporations collectivizing in lockstep to act as monopoly even though they aren't one is however a problem

Use something else. The Free Market has spoken by removing White Nationalist filth like you from their platforms @Ethreen42

Its the free market when leftists ban me from Facebook

thats not the point, the point is that Twitter and Facebook influence billions of people and them actively censoring people is bad for freedom of speech

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

bro he called me a White nat, I just got btfo'd

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>