>Well if you're saying Twitter and co are just private corps and not public platforms they should be regulated to uphold the American constitution, since they actively censor and stop information they dont like from reaching Billions of people
@Ethreen42 I'm against regulations.

Why can't he just say no kids can't consent

McDonalds should be regulated, they actively promote fat diets to billions of people that lead to a unhealthy and degenerate society

Now, I will say, price floors on labor benefit firms of economic scale, yes.

That prevents small businesses from competing against them.

No one is forcing you to use Twitter

Multiple corporations collectivizing in lockstep to act as monopoly even though they aren't one is however a problem

Use something else. The Free Market has spoken by removing White Nationalist filth like you from their platforms @Ethreen42

Its the free market when leftists ban me from Facebook

thats not the point, the point is that Twitter and Facebook influence billions of people and them actively censoring people is bad for freedom of speech

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

bro he called me a White nat, I just got btfo'd

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

@Samaritan™ Create your own company and ban the leftists then. Or are you afraid of picking yourself up from the bootstraps?

>Unironically using the phrase " picking yourself up from the bootstraps"

100% a troll

You can't say anything that isn't a prefab slogan

>more ad hom

If you aren't a leftist you're the fakest motherfucker I've ever een

As I expected from a White Nationalist idiot

Ideally, you'd not segregate in such a manner, @Thermonuclear, as it'll result in only further polarization.

>calling someone an idiot
>is an Ancap

bold words

he follows ad hominem accusation with an ad hominem attack

@Ethreen42 >thats not the point, the point is that Twitter and Facebook influence billions of people and them actively censoring people is bad for freedom of speech
Yes I agree. That doesn't violate the NAP though. The people have personal agency to not be influenced.

I would ban you from my private server

I dont really care if it violates muh NAP

You are advocating to relocate the personal agency to the govt.

I am advocating for a freer society by breaking up totalitarian companies

I'm advocating for neither.

Translation: I'm advocating for a "freer society" by punishing Capitalist companies who became successful through moral means

yes

If Google attempts to influence the 2020 election they should be broken up

^

@Samaritan™ It didn't take long for me to expose your statism

Nigger

muh statism

I am openly a statist

^

I think most people have a trouble imagining what 'non-crony-capitalism' looks like

I don't burn my nations flag

Funny that you were harping about the wonders of freedom just before I joined