private property <= personal property.
Distinction is only there for inheritance and corporate law purposes.

He was totalitarian

Because corporations are not people.

Any personal property is private property.
But not all private property is personal.

@2K even though you arent a leftist, i un ironically believe you wouldn't side with reaction when the time comes

@Uksio exactly

therefore, you are a comrade of mine

@BabaBooey 2k's actually Chaotic-Evil

He's he was a totalitarian figurehead of an authoritarian fascist state.

Every government and corporation has private property

They aren't people

Fascism isn't a full opposite of social programs that socialism claims to be about.

Group of people is allowed to share property.

That's fine

Won't work on a state level with everything being shared though

There is a limit to that

But the nazi party was absolutely not a socialist party.

That's like claiming antifa is anti fascist.

also: if there is no private property, you have to share wife too

Gommunesm

@NinjaQuick it was and it wasn't, depending on what time period and what policies you look at

Well it wasn't, patently. Hitler merely used the skeleton of the old socialist party to build up his machine.

cant wait for this place to erupt in revolution, u with me ? @ubermensch

Are you calling for violence?

In the beginning hilter made education and healthcare accessible to all, relaxed the taxes for individuals while strictening the rules for companies. And he built roads on what essentially was loans from the people.
Sounds socialist to me.
He didn't stick to that for too long though and went syndicalist-ultra-nationalist after.

People try to conflate nazism with socialism to try to prove socialism is just as bad or hitler was a socialist. Socialism is itself an unsustainable ideology

Yes he was always for social programs.

@Al Capwned no im calling for the cleansing of tge city

But social programs aren't socialism.

look how nasty it looks

the buildings could use a fresh coat of paint

Hitler did not socialize the ownership of the means of production.

But then again... soBiets were not very socialist all the way through

@Al Capwned yes, i vote red

the bourgeoise will be donating red "paint"

Saying socialism is all forms of state welfare is disingenuous

baba calling for cleansing be like

@NinjaQuick define socialism then

Social programs only work in highly cohesive monocultural countries

this is your city on capitalism