Message from @Praeceptor
Discord ID: 486131089560043533
Hey, I want to know if this chart/graph makes sense to anyone else. My critique was that it didn't have any variables on the x and y axis, which makes the lines essentially meaningless. Explain what the graph is saying or why it works, or agree how it can be fixed to make more sense. Maybe it's just my dumb fembrain that's being confounded by this, in which case it can't be helped, but lmk what you think
It's supposed to be similar to the supply and demand graph, where the intersection point is a "perfection" of sorts.
Which is also kinda weird, since it just lays supply as a linear function and demand as another.
It doesn't really say what's on X and what's on Y, although it also isn't too necessary.
See, what you posted makes sense because it relates price to quantity
Well, materialism and immaterialism don't really have variables, I think.
It's just meant to be a representation of one growing line and one, uh... ungrowing line.
But what's growing? Cultural achievement? Longevity?
Materialism and immaterialism.
What aspect of them is growing?
Well, themselves. The image you sent also explains a bit of what's what.
Guess I just get caught up in specifics too easily, then
niggas need ta ave the communista manifestito on reading lists nomsayin
we do
based!
Me and a couple guys are rewriting The Urban Guerilla rn
I get the chart now. It could definitely be explained better
Hi there
heeyyyyy @Hildegard
haven't seen you in a long time on
Yes
ive been busy furthering a policital movement
he'll yeah
Daily reminder that if you are not planning on having atleast 3 white children you're not helping the problem
^
I think helping the problem is kinda counterintuitive.
hahaah sterling
Thanks, I'm here all night
@crippling depression (((libertarian)))
@Fat Nigga 86 yes
@red pills -your black pilled friend is here
@Fat Nigga 86 fuck you, Thomas Jefferson. Is our god
(((libertarian)))
Libertarians are fags. Are you god of the fags? @crippling depression