"its not in LINKED in the article.....waaa"

Fine with me

@Sterling
Here's the study it was likely referring to, you are correct, it was not linked

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02607476.2017.1251103?journalCode=cjet20

Thank you, at least you understood what I was asking for.

Wait, @Deleted User It wasnt linked.....how on EARTH did you find it?

Finally someone with two braincells to rub together

It's bad journalism to bot cite sources
I looked it up
On a search engine

Not

Welcome to google.

If it was a broader topic, or a larger organization, it could've been much harder to find, but it's a small institute it seems

@Deleted User Dude, the time you spent dodging me asking for the article could have been used to actually link me the article and make a coffee. You even had a screenshot of it, how else do you get that if not from the article itself?

I spent no time on you.

Ouch, that edge just sliced my arm apart like a chainsaw.

You're lazy

You made the claim that a study proved it and dodged my request for said study.

Whatever, that naïveté is your problem, not mine. Just trying to give you a heads up.

You want edge? How about this one: Homosexuals are mentally ill people and should either seek treatment or be executed if they ever acted upon it.

That's like based Nippon steel folded over 1000 times.

There's more: Their bodies shouldn't be harvested for organs, as they are stained with immorality.

Are you passing out yet

I'm bleeding out here, it's slicing my body apart slash after slash.

My interest was not in the study, but in you providing all the information necessary without people having to ask.

When someone says "a study said X", they show the study.

Your interest was in getting me to do something for you. You failed.

so you whined.

Are you seriously going to play ignorant on this one too?

Man, you're a total fucking child.

40% to 60% of serial killers are homosexuals. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print

There's more where that came from, I'll post it in SCIENCE

Hm, I don't think that deserves a snarky comment or a sarcastic remark. Thanks for posting the source this time.

Claims that gay parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents are misrepresented. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657413

Go to <#373860833475690508> for more

You do know that just putting yourself on a fake high horse after a small discussion is pretty cringy, right?

Its not fake.

Really? So you're genuinely above than me as a human being because you refused a simple request and escalated it to straw man and petty insulting?

Impressive, you are truly deserving of that horse.

Correction, you didn't refuse it. You actively dodged it.

Alright, enough of that, boys.

How do you find the tons of sources regarding homosexuals and their deleterious behaviour?

I know a guy