Message from @PenSHITLORD
Discord ID: 511917787082522654
Testing my invisibility
This is more secure but also, less fulfilling
Well I'm assuming Q pointed it out for a reason
And was just called
Didnt even think about multipage ballots
It's not secure, it's just lulzy.
in general, if you can only cheat by addition (I hear some accusations of destroying ballots this season, but thats a first), it would be easier to avoid detection if the ballots you actually cheat with are split tickets, or random selections with only one more consistent selection (the target seat).
I think the precincts that do this, and have both registrars involved, can do pretty much whatever they want. They fake trouble until everone else has left, and at 2 in the morning, the insiders shore things up however they please, or however they are told to total, and that's what they do - whether by adding ballots, or pre-determining machine counts. its obvious enough by a number of metrics just looking at voter history by town where you can
its the same cities, year after year
no population anywhere got out at 85% to vote at 91% for hillary goddamned clinton
it just didnt happen. its bullshit.
Re: election results for AZ, Texas was somewhat similar is the disparity for Cruz and Beto for Senator vs Abbott and Valdez for Governor. Where Cruz won, the votes where in favor of Cruz with a narrow margin ~220k votes ahead of Beto vs Abbot winning with a commanding 1.1M votes over his Dem challenger Valdez. Not saying there is not something rotten in AZ, but just playing devil’s advocate.
I think you're adding to the point, not arguing against it
Doug Jones/Roy Moore was a pawn sacrifice for checkmate this time.
if there was to be fuckery in texas it would have been for beto
media narrative was prepping people to accept an upset if it was close enough to cheat for
And then Alex Jones kvetches so everybody writes it off as 'conspiracy'
wheres the checkmate, mate?
once these people take office... you talking voter ID laws?
These people will never take office.
In court.
That goes to the SC
SC ruling gives us Voter ID
CT has voter ID... its kind of afalse promise. doesnt mean much.
need verify of some kind
Sept 12th EO implicates the TCO's, Sept 10th DHS statement implies 90% of the vote was tallied in real time.
That's fake af voter ID.
Real voter ID would be cryptographically gauranteed to be only verifiable by the person who voted and the state would prove that that's the vote they used in the tally.
If you just have some database somewhere, that's not Voter ID, that's a facade
Hash tree based voting records are being tested already, hash trees mean countability and mathematical guarantees of authenticity.
yea, needs to be simple, one way or another, impossible to add anonymous stack of ballots against active registered list and call it votes
What you got, what you needed, and what they called it, are all different things
id wager sinema gets her seat though. just cus im used to it. Id settle for a 2020 election i could put faith in
hope for better
Make a contract I'll take you up on it.
on sinema?
I bet she doesn't get her seat.
I bet none of them do.
53-47
id throw a hundred on it, for funsies.