sounds like today's session is the one where we finally get our moving city lol

moving city - I am intrigued

we're playing kingmaker, managed to convince the GM to let our alchemist animate the city

through a combination of rules as interpreted and rule of cool, we've come up with something that is technically legal

But my GF and me are leaving our aktual group too. GM is getting lazy as fuck and has no motivation to continue our campaign. And then there is ego shit, but that was not so bad, could deal with it

I played the kingmaker campaign too as DM, it's really nice, we played to the third book if I remember correclty, but then my group lost interest. It's the same with the campaign we are leaving now. these people can't hold interst for a longer time, it's annoying. But it's cool that your DMyllows it, that's how roleplaying schould be, if it works in the world and doesn't brak the campign, allow the players some shit that is fun. And later they have to deal with all the consequences of their wish

haha yeah our GM is all about making us regret our shenanigans at a later date

Hehe exactly. But that's what makes a campaign engaging. to see that your deeds have lasting consequences, that you have impact on the world. And it's bloody fun to see your players suffer for their misbehavings XD

I'd love to have an in-person game, but only got roll20 at the moment :(

in Person game ?

at a table with real people

rather than online/voice only

ah okay

in person is cool, you can throw dice and stuff at other people and eat their last gummybears when they are on the toilet XD

But it's nice, especially if you can play stuff like Cthulhu in the dark only with candlelight, that brings a lot of atmosphere and fun

I have seen discriminating ones. They come in the form of *Women in Gaming* ect.

In the community in my area I haven't seen shit like that yet, luckily

I'm glad the players in my area are just edition tards and not sjws

Its more of a roll20 thing

What did Pazio really do game wise that was sjwish? I breezed through the pathfinder 2 playtest nothing cought that eye

It's on the first 10 pages, where they explain how to play and what's the role of player or GM. there they say you HAVE to be incluse to groups that are normaly not welcome in the community ... and that you shall not trigger players in your group .. and when someone does not like something, because your character triggers them or your way of playing triggers them, it's your fault, you have to change, do not question the one who is triggered or try to argue with them. YOU have to change

It's the whole way the paragraph is phrased, it's just stupid

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki
http://is2.4chan.org/tg/1534844694103.jpg

there is a link to a pic of the page

I didn't notice that line before

```
> even if they're not necessarily playing at your table.```

if they're not playing at my table and they're triggered by my game they can fuck off

and sometimes the situations are supposed to make you uncomfortable

it's not happy funtime hugbox

***d u n g e o n s*** & ***d r a g o n s***

sounds like the best solution is to run a pathfinder 2 camp that's as triggering as possible

Nigger Joe vs The Retarded Gobbos

hahahaha

a camp I was running recently consists of 3 players who're good friends of mine, but they're pretty left

been working on a city they're in that'll go to war with the yuan-ti but then have the elite, theocratic class port in the shitty, canabalistic, dark god worshipping values of the snake folk

was hoping they'd fight against the subliminal post-modernism of the high priests who're like, "listen, just because we don't get why snake people kill and eat other snake people and humans, doesn't mean we should stop it"

Lol

"all cultures are welcome here, snake folk included... btw, they prefer the term, 'people of scales'"

all cultures are equal

people of scales

dead