Message from @turtwig
Discord ID: 483617254022316043
forcing people to recognise their pronouns is more important than slaying goblins
And such things should be fun for all the players. If the rest don't like it it shouldn't be played. But then these people screech about discrimination and bigotry and try to get you banned from your gameshop
and that's why nobody likes them ... and not because they identify as apache helicopter furry kin or something like that
I was in a game for a little while with an sjw girl
she was an obnoxious sanctimonious cunt that could not communicate reasonably with anyone and absolutely could not take criticism
That really sucks, you have my sympathy
I've luck and only had to deal with the usual player problems, like ego and mixing plaxer knowledge
oh she was also abusing the shit out of player knowledge
I left that game and felt a lot better for it lol
it's game night tonight with my main group actuakly
sounds like today's session is the one where we finally get our moving city lol
moving city - I am intrigued
we're playing kingmaker, managed to convince the GM to let our alchemist animate the city
through a combination of rules as interpreted and rule of cool, we've come up with something that is technically legal
But my GF and me are leaving our aktual group too. GM is getting lazy as fuck and has no motivation to continue our campaign. And then there is ego shit, but that was not so bad, could deal with it
I played the kingmaker campaign too as DM, it's really nice, we played to the third book if I remember correclty, but then my group lost interest. It's the same with the campaign we are leaving now. these people can't hold interst for a longer time, it's annoying. But it's cool that your DMyllows it, that's how roleplaying schould be, if it works in the world and doesn't brak the campign, allow the players some shit that is fun. And later they have to deal with all the consequences of their wish
haha yeah our GM is all about making us regret our shenanigans at a later date
Hehe exactly. But that's what makes a campaign engaging. to see that your deeds have lasting consequences, that you have impact on the world. And it's bloody fun to see your players suffer for their misbehavings XD
I'd love to have an in-person game, but only got roll20 at the moment :(
in Person game ?
rather than online/voice only
ah okay
in person is cool, you can throw dice and stuff at other people and eat their last gummybears when they are on the toilet XD
But it's nice, especially if you can play stuff like Cthulhu in the dark only with candlelight, that brings a lot of atmosphere and fun
I have seen discriminating ones. They come in the form of *Women in Gaming* ect.
In the community in my area I haven't seen shit like that yet, luckily
I'm glad the players in my area are just edition tards and not sjws
Its more of a roll20 thing
What did Pazio really do game wise that was sjwish? I breezed through the pathfinder 2 playtest nothing cought that eye
It's on the first 10 pages, where they explain how to play and what's the role of player or GM. there they say you HAVE to be incluse to groups that are normaly not welcome in the community ... and that you shall not trigger players in your group .. and when someone does not like something, because your character triggers them or your way of playing triggers them, it's your fault, you have to change, do not question the one who is triggered or try to argue with them. YOU have to change
It's the whole way the paragraph is phrased, it's just stupid
there is a link to a pic of the page
I didn't notice that line before
```
> even if they're not necessarily playing at your table.```
if they're not playing at my table and they're triggered by my game they can fuck off
and sometimes the situations are supposed to make you uncomfortable
it's not happy funtime hugbox
***d u n g e o n s*** & ***d r a g o n s***
sounds like the best solution is to run a pathfinder 2 camp that's as triggering as possible