Message from @Soyaman

Discord ID: 377146141277552641


2017-11-06 17:20:52 UTC  

RESIST

2017-11-06 17:20:54 UTC  

a cave-dwelling american troglodyte like myself cannot possibly comprehend the technological and societal bliss that is europe

2017-11-06 17:21:08 UTC  

and their Muslim no go zones

2017-11-06 17:21:15 UTC  

And rape gangs

2017-11-06 17:21:20 UTC  

Either way, Jek. No one is trying to tell you you shouldn't have guns.
But for the love of sense. Stop trying to defend "A gun is a tool"

2017-11-06 17:21:24 UTC  

Because that's literally retarded.

2017-11-06 17:21:28 UTC  

A gun is a tool

2017-11-06 17:21:31 UTC  

*sighs*

2017-11-06 17:21:31 UTC  

👌

2017-11-06 17:21:53 UTC  

A gun is a tool

2017-11-06 17:22:05 UTC  

like literally lets define what a weapon is

2017-11-06 17:22:19 UTC  

My fridge is fully stocked with deer meat that I hunted.

I used the gun as a tool to feed my family

2017-11-06 17:22:28 UTC  

a weapon is any implement used to assault a person or animal, can we agree to that definition?

2017-11-06 17:22:58 UTC  

a rubber mallet is absolutely a weapon if you start attacking people with it, you can't logically deny that

2017-11-06 17:23:10 UTC  

nothing is intrinsicly assaulting people

2017-11-06 17:23:16 UTC  

It can be used *as* a weapon. But it isn't inherently a weapon.

2017-11-06 17:23:20 UTC  

THANK YOU

2017-11-06 17:23:28 UTC  

now we've come to some clarity

2017-11-06 17:23:39 UTC  

As if that somehow proves your point, but go on.

2017-11-06 17:23:43 UTC  

nothing is a weapon by default, it can only be *used* as a weapon

2017-11-06 17:24:07 UTC  

Things made for killing are weapons by default.

2017-11-06 17:24:24 UTC  

I have a czech military surplus rifle easily capable of downing 20 men, but the most fearsome thing i've ever shot with it is a pumpkin

2017-11-06 17:24:30 UTC  

it is not a weapon

2017-11-06 17:24:34 UTC  

Is a shotgun that fires bean bags a weapon?

2017-11-06 17:24:38 UTC  

not in the strictest sense

2017-11-06 17:25:07 UTC  

You're trying to argue that because you don't use your sword to cut down people it was never made for cutting down people to begin with.

2017-11-06 17:25:12 UTC  

the point is that there is no logical distinction between weapon and non-weapon

2017-11-06 17:25:18 UTC  

There is.

2017-11-06 17:25:27 UTC  

What about an ornamental sword?

2017-11-06 17:25:36 UTC  

It's not made for usage at all

2017-11-06 17:26:12 UTC  

Most kitchen knives are made to cut meat but not necessarily cleave through a man.
A cleaver is made to cleave the bone in meat on a table but it's horrible to try to cleave down an actual person. For that you have *larger* and generally sharper *weapons* made.

2017-11-06 17:26:21 UTC  

so if I kill somebody with, say, a benchrest gun, its a rifle that is used exclusively for high-accuracy target shooting and can't even be weilded as its literally bolted to a table, is it not a weapon?

2017-11-06 17:26:24 UTC  

Also generally known as. Here it comes. Swords.

2017-11-06 17:26:28 UTC  

Swords are weapons.

2017-11-06 17:26:39 UTC  

Guns are made for killing, they're inherently weapons.

2017-11-06 17:26:42 UTC  

ugh

2017-11-06 17:26:49 UTC  

that statement is factually untrue

2017-11-06 17:27:08 UTC  

I can name you several dozen guns clearly not designed for lethal use

2017-11-06 17:27:10 UTC  

What about a target pistol made specifically for competitive shooting?

2017-11-06 17:27:26 UTC  

Literally designed from the blueprint to be used in competition

2017-11-06 17:27:43 UTC  

Using an unicorn to disprove a trend