Message from @Boris Todbringer

Discord ID: 377185127450673152


2017-11-06 19:55:57 UTC  

What are the policies

2017-11-06 19:56:00 UTC  

no maam you *must* fuck this black man

2017-11-06 19:56:10 UTC  

This is pretty typical

2017-11-06 19:56:14 UTC  

Just because I point out differences doesn't mean I'm claiming one race to be''inferior'' to another

2017-11-06 19:56:28 UTC  

The policy implications are scary and racism so let's ignore genetics

2017-11-06 19:56:36 UTC  

Then we have no problem

2017-11-06 19:56:37 UTC  

Evolution

2017-11-06 19:56:49 UTC  

you did link the low IQ to negative societal effects

2017-11-06 19:57:05 UTC  

Let's ignore crime, economic development and culture so we won't be called racist for pointing out the obvious differences between racial groups

2017-11-06 19:57:11 UTC  

bring us to your conslusion, oh wokest one

2017-11-06 19:57:28 UTC  

They're getting sensitive

2017-11-06 19:57:39 UTC  

can we get a show of hands of everyone who actively denied that there are differences between races?

2017-11-06 19:57:53 UTC  

There is a correlation between the wealth of a nation and the average IQ of its citizens

2017-11-06 19:58:02 UTC  

So lowering the average IQ wouldn't be a good idea

2017-11-06 19:58:09 UTC  

If you are in favour of universal human right than the policy implications matter

2017-11-06 19:58:10 UTC  

Through mixing up the races

2017-11-06 19:58:15 UTC  

You tried to wave it away

2017-11-06 19:58:20 UTC  

you're implying race mixing lowers IQ, which again you have no proof for

2017-11-06 19:58:20 UTC  

Now who's being coy

2017-11-06 19:58:57 UTC  

you clearly don't understand hgow genetics work because you actually aren't a perfect half between your parents

2017-11-06 19:59:02 UTC  

@radeon If you mix a black person with an IQ of 70 with a White person with an IQ of 105 you are going to get a child that has an IQ lower than 105. That is pretty basic genetics

2017-11-06 19:59:09 UTC  

not really

2017-11-06 19:59:33 UTC  

@radeon Never claimed you are a ''perfect half'', but certainly lower

2017-11-06 19:59:33 UTC  

That is not necessarily true, although it appears likely

2017-11-06 19:59:46 UTC  

Very likely, in fact

2017-11-06 19:59:48 UTC  

by your same logic if a person with blue eyes has a child with a person with green eyes their eyes would be teal

2017-11-06 19:59:53 UTC  

that of course isnt the case

2017-11-06 19:59:54 UTC  

Who has the dominant gene?

2017-11-06 20:00:16 UTC  

how do you know the genes that promote higher IQ aren't dominant?

2017-11-06 20:00:17 UTC  

@Boris Todbringer You just showed that you really have no idea how genetics works

2017-11-06 20:00:35 UTC  

I am talking about averages here

2017-11-06 20:00:38 UTC  

The dominant Gene will take over even if the other gene is different

2017-11-06 20:00:42 UTC  

i love this, 4th grader tier genetics

2017-11-06 20:00:45 UTC  

That's not how genetics work

2017-11-06 20:00:57 UTC  

Except intelligence is not controlled by a single gene

2017-11-06 20:01:00 UTC  

genetics don't work with averages

2017-11-06 20:01:10 UTC  

let me explain it to you how this works

2017-11-06 20:01:22 UTC  

think of your genetic code as a wrestling team

2017-11-06 20:01:31 UTC  

Even if the white parent has the dominant gene, the IQ will likely not be higher than 105 regardless. Are you impliying that the other parent's genes have no influence on the child's genetic makeup? @meratrix

2017-11-06 20:01:53 UTC  

Btw we still dont know what the majority of our genes do

2017-11-06 20:02:02 UTC  

eaach gene is a wrestler, and the other set of genes from the other parent are a roughly equivieent team with some genes weaker but some stronger