Message from @GumbyShrimp

Discord ID: 377353149893050368


2017-11-07 06:59:42 UTC  

Reporters on the ground covering events

2017-11-07 07:00:07 UTC  

Analysts collating and representing data

2017-11-07 07:00:32 UTC  

Presenters portraying common themes and interacting with the community

2017-11-07 07:00:46 UTC  

That factor is growing

2017-11-07 07:01:09 UTC  

We also need a set of consistent and robust ethics and best practices

2017-11-07 07:01:31 UTC  

Enforced transparency and peer review

2017-11-07 07:01:42 UTC  

Stable business models

2017-11-07 07:02:15 UTC  

Individual and collective brand strength

2017-11-07 07:02:48 UTC  

on what scale do you think we should be looking at? Is this a grassroots solution or should an attempt be made to connect preexisting people and ideas to create the movement?

2017-11-07 07:02:51 UTC  

To actually replace legacy media as opposed to just undermining their agendas

2017-11-07 07:03:01 UTC  

Both

2017-11-07 07:03:30 UTC  

Im fully on board with this, the market is there so what you're putting forward is spot on

2017-11-07 07:04:03 UTC  

have any attempts been made at this "rebrand" (or movement or what ever the fuck its called)

2017-11-07 07:04:31 UTC  

Only on an individual basis from what I can see

2017-11-07 07:04:59 UTC  

Of course for the system to work it will have to capitalize on established individuals

2017-11-07 07:05:09 UTC  

mmmm yes, I often wonder if there is talk between sargon and co about this

2017-11-07 07:05:52 UTC  

capitalise away I'd say, youd come out with a far more positive resualt that the reset of the media

2017-11-07 07:05:52 UTC  

Part of the problem is the skeptic community is heavily loaded in commentators

2017-11-07 07:06:10 UTC  

We need a deep range of skill sets

2017-11-07 07:06:22 UTC  

It's something I've been thinking about

2017-11-07 07:06:41 UTC  

I used to watch all of them at one point now I just watch 2 or 3

2017-11-07 07:06:50 UTC  

I will definitely exploit people's contributions as I get more involved

2017-11-07 07:07:31 UTC  

I watch a handful

2017-11-07 07:08:01 UTC  

who would you like to see involved?

2017-11-07 07:08:39 UTC  

The thing is my vision at least is not necessarily of a cohesive group

2017-11-07 07:08:43 UTC  

wondering if some kind og coalition would be enough

2017-11-07 07:09:07 UTC  

But levels of individuals that adhere to certain basic standards for their roles

2017-11-07 07:09:27 UTC  

Coordinating in qualified trust with other levels of the system

2017-11-07 07:09:53 UTC  

We would need people like Tim Pool on the ground

2017-11-07 07:10:38 UTC  

Part of the problem is establishing strong and flexible connections between large numbers

2017-11-07 07:11:09 UTC  

Like Sargon generally trusts Pool bc they've met and he's reviewed his work

2017-11-07 07:11:30 UTC  

But a strong system may require hundreds of reporters

2017-11-07 07:12:01 UTC  

Ok, excuse my ignorance, Im going to be wrong here, but its an idea

2017-11-07 07:12:54 UTC  

is it possible you use something like the amazon cloud to build a streaming platform explicitly for this purpose?

2017-11-07 07:13:32 UTC  

It's certainly possible

2017-11-07 07:13:37 UTC  

an independant jouralist platform that have a code of ethics for people to access

2017-11-07 07:13:46 UTC  

A major issue is social capital

2017-11-07 07:14:01 UTC  

Something I am working on building

2017-11-07 07:14:20 UTC  

I would be interested in being involved if at all necessary

2017-11-07 07:14:54 UTC  

There is definitely a lot to do

2017-11-07 07:15:17 UTC  

More thinking will have to be done to determine actual courses of action