He forgot why the social programes were made in the first place

Mainly to avoid an uprising

fair enough

they need to at least be consolidated into one program (in the US that is)

And charities waste an enormous amount of money

not really

Just look at the red cross

compared to how social systems work

they have to pay people

just like the government does

If you donate donate it to your local church or something like that

Also his stance on the separation of church of state wories me

dont you guys pay a church tax though?

I think the main point of his ideas are still Liberty>security

Yes we pay

in a way that gives them a say in your gov?

Not much

Mostly holidays

We have to close the stores

And we have religious education aviable but it isnt mandatory

but it is still some say

the problem i have with Sep of Church and State in the US is how they got that specific verbage

And you still have the occasional judge/politician that bases some absolutely retarded decision on some backwards and literal interpretation of the bible.

And then he goes on a rant how UK shouldnt have alowwed muslims in

Making no differentiation beween muslim and islamist

I am not from UK so its kinda hard for me to judge that

They have had alot more problems in that area than the US

Yes because they alowed way too many people in a short time ad created paralel societies

I think it has more to deal with barriers to entry through welfare

if welfare pays more than a low paying job there is a problem

The best path to assimilation is work

And it shoudnt but that is not an argument for its abolishment

no but it is an example of how groups will not assimilate in large numbers

And something I noticed is in the idea of free trade

Nobody talks about reciprocity

how so?

Should we do free trade with china?

We allow them to buy land, companies etc.

They dont return the favour

It depends

I say we should prioritise trading If the laws are the same