Message from @Durtle02

Discord ID: 383871636866203648


2017-11-25 01:06:36 UTC  

Kinda funny to see the ignorant atheists in the comments claiming that Jesus indeed was a fictional character. Shows you there are plenty of atheists that just have faith on what somebody else told them and didn't verify.

2017-11-25 01:08:04 UTC  

They *know* Christianity *has to* be false, but they don't know which parts. So they just assume *everything is false*.

2017-11-25 01:48:01 UTC  

jesus the historical figure probably existed but his name wasn't jesus and obviously most of the events attributed to him were exaggerated or fabricated

2017-11-25 02:04:40 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372513679964635138/383800123349663755/BnJ5h77nrO4.png

2017-11-25 02:29:18 UTC  

There's some evidence that Jesus existed, and it wasn't just a random dude that happened to be called Jesus, it was the Jesus that lead to the creation of Christianity. You can argue whether he had magical powers or not, but there's just about as much evidence of him existing and appearing in public as most other figures of antiquity.

2017-11-25 02:36:53 UTC  

the name jesus literally did not exist yet

2017-11-25 02:37:16 UTC  

jesus is a greek version of jeshua which is the aramaic form of joshua, which is hebrew

2017-11-25 02:37:49 UTC  

there are no historical records of jesus of nazareth outside of the bible

2017-11-25 02:38:03 UTC  

there are records of people with the same name, but it was a very common name

2017-11-25 02:38:25 UTC  

something like turning water to wine was probably noteworthy enough to mention *somewhere*

2017-11-25 02:42:42 UTC  

The Jews also recorded it.

2017-11-25 02:44:13 UTC  

>Paul R. Eddy has stated that as Rome's preeminent historian, Tacitus was generally known for checking his sources and was not in the habit of reporting gossip.

2017-11-25 05:57:21 UTC  

whoops.

2017-11-25 05:57:26 UTC  

nearly forgot to vote

2017-11-25 05:57:44 UTC  

probably says something about the general enthusiasm for this election tho

2017-11-25 06:48:43 UTC  

@Durtle02 "bullshit!!!!"

2017-11-25 06:48:50 UTC  

Lol

2017-11-25 10:39:34 UTC  

how the fuck does it have 9k likes

2017-11-25 10:41:33 UTC  

they can say whatever they want, and then they can do whatever they want (even if it contradicts what they told you) without you knowing what the hell they're doing

2017-11-25 10:41:47 UTC  

that's what a private company can do, I will never understand americans

2017-11-25 13:46:27 UTC  

Yeah! Trust us, we're Comcast, you have our word 😉

2017-11-25 13:53:05 UTC  

Comcast is senpai

2017-11-25 13:53:17 UTC  

Comcast : Bend over

2017-11-25 13:54:02 UTC  

I just upgraded to 1gb internet for 70

2017-11-25 13:54:17 UTC  

Its not all bad

2017-11-25 13:56:26 UTC  

There wouldnt be a problem If there were many ISP in a region

2017-11-25 13:57:06 UTC  

I just think is is a massive overreaction

2017-11-25 13:57:25 UTC  

There will be cons and pros

2017-11-25 13:57:39 UTC  

Gotchya, Dan 😉

2017-11-25 13:57:54 UTC  

There are legitimate conserns

2017-11-25 13:58:19 UTC  

But NN was only in place for two years

2017-11-25 14:00:35 UTC  

The ISP acted like there was NN before it was passed in 2015

2017-11-25 14:01:13 UTC  

I havent seen any fracturing before it was made official

2017-11-25 14:09:56 UTC  

that's probably not accurate - what you should say is "we presume ISPs acted like there was NN before 2015", because american ISPs/telecoms were actively engaged in lobbying to _stop_ net neutrality being implemented in europe from 2004 and onwards until it was enacted around 2011

2017-11-25 14:41:57 UTC  

NN is protected here in Europe

2017-11-25 14:42:47 UTC  

The image you have senn about paying differentry forsocial media apps is for mobile data foe wich NN doesnt apply

2017-11-25 15:47:02 UTC  

Good, because nobody uses mobile data for internet access.