Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 391730177878655009


2017-12-16 23:13:13 UTC  

so they can send 2 identical resumes

2017-12-16 23:13:20 UTC  

I lov e being able to sleep my way up the ladder

2017-12-16 23:13:28 UTC  

GEEZ I WISH MEN COULD DO THAT

2017-12-16 23:13:32 UTC  

HIMMMMMMMMMM

2017-12-16 23:13:32 UTC  

Are you in favor of enforcing equality in these jobs?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372513679964635138/391729589921120258/9-out-of-10-registered-nurses-are-female-1424184635.39-1844336.png

2017-12-16 23:13:44 UTC  

@Durtle02 the burden would be on you to prove most feminists disagree with me i guess, I don't really care what "most people" think

2017-12-16 23:13:53 UTC  

oh fuck off

2017-12-16 23:13:57 UTC  

Because it looks like we'll have to fire quite a bit of women from comfy jobs.

2017-12-16 23:14:07 UTC  

@DanielKO nope, I am in favor of everyone acknowledging their biases, then it won't be a problem

2017-12-16 23:14:21 UTC  
2017-12-16 23:14:37 UTC  

Okay, so you don't want gender quotas?

2017-12-16 23:14:50 UTC  

let's force women into garbage collection and shitcleaning guys

2017-12-16 23:14:55 UTC  

since

2017-12-16 23:14:56 UTC  

If the majority of feminist were identified in modern day they would be classified as a anti male group

2017-12-16 23:14:57 UTC  

muh equality

2017-12-16 23:14:58 UTC  

you do realize that the methodology for proving subconcious bias is very much flawed and has failed to be repeated in studies multiple times

2017-12-16 23:15:17 UTC  

subconcious bias is unscientifc horse shit

2017-12-16 23:15:23 UTC  

In their study, Moss-Racusin and her colleagues created a fictitious resume of an applicant for a lab manager position. Two versions of the resume were produced that varied in only one, very significant, detail: the name at the top. One applicant was named Jennifer and the other John. Moss-Racusin and her colleagues then asked STEM professors from across the country to assess the resume. Over one hundred biologists, chemists, and physicists at academic institutions agreed to do so. Each scientist was randomly assigned to review either Jennifer or John's resume.

Woman working at Argonne Labs
Woman working at Argonne Labs (Source: Argonne, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The results were surprising—they show that the decision makers did not evaluate the resume purely on its merits. Despite having the exact same qualifications and experience as John, Jennifer was perceived as significantly less competent. As a result, Jenifer experienced a number of disadvantages that would have hindered her career advancement if she were a real applicant. Because they perceived the female candidate as less competent, the scientists in the study were less willing to mentor Jennifer or to hire her as a lab manager. They also recommended paying her a lower salary. Jennifer was offered, on average, $4,000 per year (13%) less than John.
http://gender.stanford.edu/news/2014/why-does-john-get-stem-job-rather-jennifer

2017-12-16 23:15:48 UTC  

and they did this once

2017-12-16 23:15:50 UTC  

Is this a quote or a <#382984642300477444>

2017-12-16 23:15:52 UTC  

nice

2017-12-16 23:15:55 UTC  

one study

2017-12-16 23:16:02 UTC  

that proves everything

2017-12-16 23:16:03 UTC  

just a sample size of one

2017-12-16 23:16:04 UTC  

no need guys

2017-12-16 23:16:12 UTC  

wow

2017-12-16 23:16:15 UTC  

How about this

2017-12-16 23:16:22 UTC  

@franti gender biases undoubtedly oppress everyone of all genders.

2017-12-16 23:16:31 UTC  

you have to prove it first

2017-12-16 23:16:37 UTC  

lol

2017-12-16 23:16:41 UTC  

@meratrix did you read the quote you retard

2017-12-16 23:16:43 UTC  

Since when is beeing a veterinarian opresed

2017-12-16 23:16:45 UTC  

yes I did

2017-12-16 23:16:46 UTC  

they had a sample size of 100+

2017-12-16 23:16:47 UTC  

Wait a second, didn't Australia just try the whole "resumes can't have gender information", only to find that women got hired even less?

2017-12-16 23:16:57 UTC  

It is a hard proffesion

2017-12-16 23:17:04 UTC  

i.e. before, they were being hired for their vagina points.

2017-12-16 23:17:07 UTC  

KEK

2017-12-16 23:17:12 UTC  
2017-12-16 23:17:14 UTC  

They didn't give the same people both resumes because that would be obvious