So you'd rather them not have a job? /s

Well, then I don't see why you would call yourself feminist.

^

@DanielKO because I want to fix gender discrimination

Because that's definitely not what's taught in Gender Studies departments.

of which I have provided a yet to be refuted source that it exists

@méep The quote said that they didn't give both resumes to one person, because of course they wouldn't, but, the problem is then that different people will offer different salaries to the applicant because they are different fucking people

how about your source sucks

is that good enough?

thus, it is a shit study

@meratrix individual quirks are factored out when you account for sample size dipshit

you wouldn't see replicable trends if it was just human error

Give us one example of discrimination you're fighting against.

you source is shit

um, no dipshit. It's still diferent people, and because the sample size is one fucking resume, it's worthless

period

you dickless knave

your source is not scientific at all

Let the grown ups talk, please.

@meratrix but they gave individual resumes to a multitude of people mowron

@méep Do you think eastern european (post commie) states are more imbalanced in regard of female scientists than the west?

yes, but it's still the same resume, so, they would need to give multiple pairs of one resume with two different names

that would be better

but you still have the problem of different people evaluating one half of each pair

@franti I don't know about eastern europe

mathematically his source is basically doing 125 C 1
@meratrix

@méep We got more women into tech by forcing them.

No stay at home mums here

@meratrix individual human error is factored out when you repeat the process multiple times

dude

this is science class 5th grade

it's fucking 125 Choose 1

wait

what was the sample size?

125?

👀

lmao

125

125 people, choosing 2 results

there's a possible 7750 combinations

and a very poor margin of error