KEK

@DanielKO yes

They didn't give the same people both resumes because that would be obvious

guess what

what about vagina point hirings @méep

oh wait

different people will offer different salaries

@DanielKO australian government already was hiring women for falsely inflated reasons

@méep

innoveint through huh?

@méep prove it then

you fuck

vagina hiring points aren't good

I'm not a fan

what ever you say

everyone should just become educated to remove their biases

So you'd rather them not have a job? /s

Well, then I don't see why you would call yourself feminist.

^

@DanielKO because I want to fix gender discrimination

Because that's definitely not what's taught in Gender Studies departments.

of which I have provided a yet to be refuted source that it exists

@méep The quote said that they didn't give both resumes to one person, because of course they wouldn't, but, the problem is then that different people will offer different salaries to the applicant because they are different fucking people

how about your source sucks

is that good enough?

thus, it is a shit study

@meratrix individual quirks are factored out when you account for sample size dipshit

you wouldn't see replicable trends if it was just human error

Give us one example of discrimination you're fighting against.

you source is shit

um, no dipshit. It's still diferent people, and because the sample size is one fucking resume, it's worthless

period

you dickless knave

your source is not scientific at all

Let the grown ups talk, please.

@meratrix but they gave individual resumes to a multitude of people mowron

@méep Do you think eastern european (post commie) states are more imbalanced in regard of female scientists than the west?

yes, but it's still the same resume, so, they would need to give multiple pairs of one resume with two different names

that would be better

but you still have the problem of different people evaluating one half of each pair

@franti I don't know about eastern europe