Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 391735287329587200


2017-12-16 23:26:57 UTC  

there's a possible 7750 combinations

2017-12-16 23:29:58 UTC  

and a very poor margin of error

2017-12-16 23:30:31 UTC  

"The results were surprising—they show that the decision makers did not evaluate the resume purely on its merits. Despite having the exact same qualifications and experience as John"

2017-12-16 23:30:37 UTC  

you know everytime they say that

2017-12-16 23:30:47 UTC  

I want to know what the resume was

2017-12-16 23:31:38 UTC  

Also @méep, to have any inling of reliability in this study they would not only need multiple resumes but multiple fields as well

2017-12-16 23:31:52 UTC  

"Because they perceived the female candidate as less competent, the scientists in the study were less willing to mentor Jennifer or to hire her as a lab manager"
probably because girls won't take that extra step and go futher beyond

2017-12-16 23:31:55 UTC  
2017-12-16 23:32:14 UTC  

girls are **WAYYYY** less likely to go the extra mile

2017-12-16 23:32:27 UTC  

they'll do lagom and stop

2017-12-16 23:32:48 UTC  

@Deleted User Oh no now the whole "genders dont have natural tendencies" is going to come up

2017-12-16 23:32:52 UTC  

so the question is:

2017-12-16 23:33:27 UTC  

why the fuck would I hire someone who would do lagom, vs a person who would go above and beyond and do that extra crunch of work?

2017-12-16 23:33:35 UTC  

^

2017-12-16 23:34:11 UTC  

@méep doesn't know shit about economics and has never worked a day in its life

2017-12-16 23:34:49 UTC  

@Durtle02 yeah exactly, the "MUH genders dont have natural tendencies"

2017-12-16 23:34:57 UTC  

kek ~~They do tho :p~~

2017-12-16 23:35:13 UTC  

So one thing I noticed, Female faculty are less likely to recommend hiring more females.

2017-12-16 23:36:06 UTC  

And they don't want to mentor female hires.

2017-12-16 23:36:08 UTC  

I wonder why?

2017-12-16 23:36:10 UTC  

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

2017-12-16 23:36:36 UTC  

Well, you have to wonder, because it's not been investigated.

2017-12-16 23:36:38 UTC  

how fucking deceving

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372513679964635138/391735402387472396/Untitled.png

2017-12-16 23:36:40 UTC  

because "MUH power politics" ^4

2017-12-16 23:37:00 UTC  

it's only a difference of $4000 yet it looks huge in the graph

2017-12-16 23:37:00 UTC  

Look at that huge differ... oh, where's the zero?

2017-12-16 23:37:12 UTC  

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

2017-12-16 23:37:21 UTC  

basic graph manipulation

2017-12-16 23:37:25 UTC  

it's like that stunt nvida pulled

2017-12-16 23:37:42 UTC  

If you're going to remove 25000 just finish off the extra 4000 why dont you?

2017-12-16 23:37:48 UTC  

I don't know of a single journal/conference where this graph would be allowed.

2017-12-16 23:38:11 UTC  

Oh, right... gender studies...

2017-12-16 23:38:17 UTC  

hahahahah

2017-12-16 23:38:53 UTC  

another graph for you guys

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372513679964635138/391735972704026624/Untitled.png

2017-12-16 23:39:16 UTC  

would you look at that, the female faculty want to hire more male students

2017-12-16 23:39:29 UTC  

muh internal muhsoggyknees amirite?

2017-12-16 23:39:44 UTC  

OH AND LOOK AT THAT

2017-12-16 23:39:54 UTC  

The paper could just as easily be "female faculty discriminate more than male faculty".

2017-12-16 23:39:57 UTC  

The **MALE** faculty want to hire more females

2017-12-16 23:40:01 UTC  

IMAGINE MY SHOCK

2017-12-16 23:40:03 UTC  

wot