Message from @MikeHaydenOnCoffeeBreak
Discord ID: 427845093047664650
This is getting more retarded
We are going to break the Laws of Physics to bring you more retarded π
https://lawfareblog.com/canada-tries-domestic-bulk-collection-it-just-might-work
"Every step of this process must be recorded, including an analystβs justification for conducting a query and the basis for retaining results. The bill also requires periodic and random auditing, and all auditing reports must be provided to the National Security Intelligence and Review Agency (NSIRA), a new review body introduced in Part 1 of the bill with the authority to investigate the activities of all national security agencies. Whatβs more, should NSIRA be of the opinion that the querying or exploitation of a dataset may not be in compliance with the law they can refer the matter to the Federal Court of Canada.
"...Instead, by placing judicial control at the retention stage, establishing a higher threshold for use, mandating robust safeguards, and giving the review body some teeth, this bill may prove to be both constitutionally viable and operationally feasible."
err no
Canada is a lost cause.
I knew that mong looking orc was responsible
this is a good step for Canada
is it?
mhm
why?
allows them to do their job in combating terrorism more effectively. Whilst protecting privacy and civil liberties... and establishing more oversight mechanisms
as explained in the piece, and mandated by the bill
it aims to have the same review/oversight mechanisms basically present in the US and UK
I wouldn't go down that road
that's a good road to go down, since that means it's very effective in its review/oversight... the US sets the standard in which to have checks and balances of its Intelligence Community
for independence and fairness
no
no
yes
no
https://www.dni.gov/files/icotr/Section702-Basics-Infographic.pdf this looks at in a basic overview, the mechanisms in place for one program. Very easy to understand
My Mother and my Father worked for GCHQ, that's where they met
and your WRONG
that's not an argument. I am CORRECT.
nope you are wrong
nope
then we will have to agree to disagree
if you cannot prove otherwise, you MUST accept the evidence provided to you
"that's a good road to go down, since that means it's very effective in its review/oversight... the US sets the standard in which to have checks and balances of its Intelligence Community
for independence and fairness" Must be proven otherwise
I cannot tell you what colour the paint on the walls is in GCHQ
I cannot tell you if they have paint or wallpaper
I mean his name is patriotact/fisa forever
if you claim they do not have oversight or an effective one as the Americans have, that must be proven to be the case
they are reading this chat. INFOWARS DOT COM
https://www.gchq.gov.uk/features/gchq-oversight what is wrong in this?
GCHQ does way more than it's supposed to
evidence.