Message from @Ctrlaltlama
Discord ID: 458928679360135169
And I get it, yeah he says crazy stuff and his rhetoric has an effect that hasn't always right but what his rhetoric *has* accomplished?!
***DAMN*** DONNY!!
The thing with trump. You have to dig below the shomanship
And follow that with his actions
Rhetoric means nothing if your actions betray you. Like Obama
I've said it and I'll keep saying it, people need to appreciate not just when he talks shit. He has had numerous speeches where he literally listed off people who were doing good. He *always* points people out in every speech who are doing a good job and schmoozes em, but not just that, he sorts the wheat from the chaff.
It's not as though he spends a disproportionate time being a critic towards the DNC and the fake news (who are really his only targets (not the fags or the blacks or any of that shit)), he spends easily as much time thanking people and letting everyone know just who it is and what they're getting done.
True.
TBH those are defensive battles for him as well the otherside shot the first roun lol
You know when I said it was one of his better speeches I didn't mean to say the other ones are bad.
Most of them are good.
USA has quid the UK human rights council
UN not UK
For good reasons
Isreal aside. The members are some of the worst human rights abusers. China, Cuba, Venezuela. And these countries would shoot illigal immigrants in and out of their borders...But the coubcel decided to bring up US Immigration. So that was the last straw. To be honest, we didnt even join the council until Obama.
Even Bush knew the councel was a farse
@UKEEP🌷 W. Bush did this as well
@Ctrlaltlama Bush never left. It was created duribg Bush's first term and he never joined. He saw the farse for what it wast. Obama jumped on cause his muslim homies were on it
"Intel classified an email from Loretta Lynch so much that unscrewing it so Congress can see the bare minimum requires higher levels of authority" - Basically
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhQQtU8IvLk Surprised to see a lot of antagonism in the comments. I guess Dave will always have has pathetic haters.
I can confirm application was received and accepted in regards to Sargon. The membership sign up process does not enforce them to disclose alter online identies or their online profiles. Vetting will take place obviously to go through their profiles no exceptions will be made if he has posted blatantly racist comments using derogatory language (I think we can call identify real racism not the distorted new leftist version). If anybody would like to raise a formal complaint about a new or any members online content they can download fill in and send official complaint forms from MyUKIP.
I love that one word you aay offhanded years ago could ban you from a party...
Seems so
Apparently so yes
Unless ukip finds some blatant, unironic racisn
which is fair I suppose
Yeah we have to be careful and of course blatant racism or anything similar will be a legit offence and you will be kicked but if it's an out of context word you used then the chances of you being kicked out is slim
I mean look at count. If we were to kick sargon out then we would have to do so with count
I can agree with not wanting racists
asp if your party's schtick is UK independence
you'll have some trynna get in I assume
Oh we've had many
Out party was plagued with them but thankfully they left for parties like for Britain
Hopefully it remains that way
yannow there's one thing sargon has said that I hold real true for multiethnic countries and areas
the bants strengthen bonds between groups ans nobody should be safe
if bants offend you you need to reevaluate your faith in your identity