Message from @MuChaDo
Discord ID: 493388373801697280
What if the Cartel has a monopoly on force
Enforcement agencies wont have a monopoly on force, there will always be another to challenge their claim. And this implies that the cartel with the monopoly on force will be worse than the power-hungry mess of a government we have today
Woke is he who realises that warlords have already taken over
Woke is a stupid word and using it yourself is self-determined in my eyes
Agreed
Awake or Insighted
Pick one
I prefer enlightened
<:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>
Ah yes, good choice
Don't use the stupid left-wing term "Woke". Its usually used unironically to legitimise their illegitimate power grabs
All current societies on earth emerged from anarchy did they not?
No, tribalism has a social heirachy
So did feudalism
So what will emerge from 'anarcho-whatever'?
Most monarchal systems arose through the DROK
Cartels
Tribalism is a form of anarchy though
No rule of law
Dude, it's mot
Tribalism has rules of law
Nah, the rules of the tribe were decide by the chief
They are enforced by their cheiftain and enders
Yes, decided arbitrarily by the chief
And his cronies
On their whim
Yes, sounds like a state
Cronies is the wrong word, you mean warriors
Tribalism is a form of social heirachy, not technically a state
Any of you heard of anarcho-Ireland or saga-period Iceland. They were pretty good examples of what ancapistan may look like law-wise. The rulings of a court were decided by an appointed elder and enforced privately
Social hierarchy emerges naturally from human society
There was no state used to catch the bad guy for you
You would usually raise the hue and cry
@AsianMessiah yeah, so that'd be Tribalistic Capitalism then
Or rely on the other men in your tithing
Anarchy is a state of nature so will be based on a hierarchy
That's an oxymoron
Depends on what you really mean by hierarchy
I hope you arent using it the commie way
A hierarchy of leaders / followers