Message from @Dwarforn
Discord ID: 493396120894963712
what you say you want is not Anarchal
Also noted is that you accept the existence of tribes but somehow object to the notion of warlords
it is defined as "Neotribal capitalism"
I have heard this point by lib-socs before, the definition of anarchy has changed from "no hierarchies", to "no state" @Dwarforn
but at the end of the day its semantics
@MuChaDo In most tribes the peasants are greater in numbers than the rule-developing entity
But not in firepower
i.e. military capability
yes, but the employers of the said peasants have more power
becuase they have greater wealth
Screw communism, but what stops them becoming the societal equivalent of Tsarist nobles
Also the 'rule developing entity' functions as a single entity, but the 'peasants' are individuals or at best small groups
Well not really, both the employer and the employee benefit from eachother symbiotically. The employer values the labour more than the $10 and the employee values the $10 more than the labour. Therefore what stops them from becoming agressive cunts is the fact that productivity is lessened when the incentive to work is decreased seeing as you will die if you work as quickly as if you dont @Dwarforn This was one of the failures of the USSR
@MuChaDo Ancapistan will most likely be formed in America, a country where the rate of firearm ownership is greater than the fucking population and this is WITH the state's added "protection", once thats gone I expect it will increase drastically making it almost impossible for an agressor
(Tsarist Nobility is clearly PRE COMMUNISM since its "Tsarist") Russian Nobles could claim Estateless nobility: obtained without the allotment and securing of a landed estate
The "fucking population" has limited military capability
Ancap = chess game in which neither player has to follow the rules. First move wins
@AsianMessiah Yes, America will become a real life **Tom Clancy's: The Division**
Well, for one the accumulation of such artilery takes time. Now, with the amount of information being passed through the internet increased, the likelyhood that we would be able to detect an oncoming storm of a warlord is high, Therefore we would value a few 100 bucks more than being enslaved and then will pay for assasins to take down a would-be warlord. The incentive for this to be an accurate and efficient process is high. Your chess game annalogy is flawed, the state has already decided the rules and flipped the board over anyways @MuChaDo
@Dwarforn I have never played a Clancy
Way too expensive and full of autistic kids for me
what, Siege?
Yh
its like $20
Humble Bundle dude
Ik, thats expensive nigga
Lol, the Ancap is poor
<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
The state's inflation (the tax that even 5 year olds have to pay) have hurt alot
My $100 of savings can only buy like a fucking Chinese Hauwei
The old ones
The meme ones
But you ARE American right? I Thought you guys always boast about how wealthy you are
I'm not, I dont have a pound sign on my keyboard
I dont have the time to go copy and paste it
so you're a British Citizen?
Yes
🤔
if that is the case you must earn minimum wage
As in I earn minimum wage?