Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 526563745468645405
Did you even read into that, or just the headline?
They decided it had to be decided at the state level
Which is a concession of authority by the Fed, but for the worst topic.
You do realize it is NOW illegal in Michigan, but the case in question happened prior to the law being enacted, and we can't apply laws retroactively?
The one thing they should have authority on
I mean that shit didn't just happen one time
So really, the opposite happened.
And honestly it should already fall under child abuse.
You should be glad that is the direction the court took
speaking of complicity with authoritarians...
thats literally all he said
"extremely disturbed"
not calling china out for thier bullshit
he feels bad, but he isn't going to do anything about it
@EnderOctanus So you are advocating for the retroactive application of laws, to prior activities?
WRECK THEM TRUDEAU... YOU LITERALLY CAN'T FUCK IT UP, YET YOU STILL ARE.
I advocate for enforcement of existing law.
It is being actively enforced
Cutting a girl's genitals up is child abuse at BEST.
It is now
That makes no sense. You can't say it wasn't assault to punch someone until a judge said, "Oh yeah guess that counts."
That's how laws work
I feel like you don't see my point.
I see your point
I don't agree
That it was already illegal to abuse children?
And that it's clearly child abuse even if nobody has made an arrest on it before?
Circumcision is still legal, and FGM was considered to be equivalent before this new law
Still dumb.
It's spcifically on purpose
ðŸ˜
I find it reprehensible
But I respect the law
How would you like it if the gov't imprisoned you for something you did years ago, that they made illegal just yesterday?
I see it as having always been a clear violation of child abuse law.
Just nobody got charged because 'culture'.
By that logic, we could declare male circumcision to be child abuse tomorrow, and half the country would be in prison by that evening
True.
It's still wrong.