I feel like I'm missing context.

i think it would be more informational to look at the differences between HolyC and C

but this OS does look like no small amount of work went into it

Oh, you're talking about TempleOS still.

I find it fascinating how source code assets can be linked, retroactively updated, and stored directly in the file

http://www.codersnotes.com/notes/a-constructive-look-at-templeos/

not a fan of: no main function, top level scope is your main loop

Is there any chance of the GNU project moving to this from the Linux kernel?

also not a fan of JIT compiling

GNU doesnt have a distro

linux distro devs put GNU on Linux, not GNU

Mmm. I'm not saavy with this kind of shit. I thought it was the other way around.

bet u thought it was GNU/Linux

I actually did.

So really it's more Linux/GNU?

only if you consider a c compiler and a text editor to be an operating system

I thought GNU also encompassed GNOME and other things.

hm more or less ya

yes some distros use gnome

but gnu nor gnome have a native distro

That makes sense.

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/141114/what-is-the-relationship-between-gnu-and-gnome

GNU was supposed to be an OS but they couldnt finish a kernel in 10 years

https://twitter.com/GiveMeThouMemes/status/1045859595166601216

RMS had some autistic idea for a really complex kernel made of multiple programs, but says Linus got his made faster because he went with the traditional way of writing 1 program to do the job

So in the end, Linus decides to write an OS, and sees some helpful tools in the GNU project and uses them

Isn't saying that RMS is autistic rather redundant?

programmers love redundancies and recursion

PowerISA fully unpacked means

Performance Optimized With Enhanced Reduced Instruction Set Computer Instruction Set Architecture

Who the fuck even uses POWER anymore?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw

Look at this fucker.

Is this not the face of autism?

that fucking gringo accent, man lol

Stallman only calls computer programmers "hackers" because he'd prefer to see them programming for free

<:Commie_ball:466404411535785995>

We live in the age of patreon.

There's no reason for anybody to work for free if they don't want to, even if they want to contribute to free projects.

my goal in open source is to take and give nothing back <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

why code for Google and Microsoft, for free?