Message from @AsianMessiah

Discord ID: 503857280710606893


2018-10-22 08:54:15 UTC  

Like if you push down on a plunger in a toilet. It forces things down right? Similarly to the weight of the buildings as they fell

2018-10-22 08:54:24 UTC  

I actually think there was more to 9/11 then just a plane hitting the building in all honesty. Watch any highrise building fall. Fires are irrelevant, they're designed against fires. The tower should've topled in a irregular way.

2018-10-22 08:54:56 UTC  

It wasn’t attack and still fell that’s the fishy one, and I’ll agree something is very much up with that building collapse

2018-10-22 08:54:58 UTC  

Tower 7 bucko

2018-10-22 08:55:30 UTC  

Why would it fall in an irregular way, madcombat?

2018-10-22 08:56:41 UTC  

Y slowmode?

2018-10-22 08:57:41 UTC  

no clue

2018-10-22 08:58:57 UTC  

Simple, the structural supports below. If you argue on the basis that the force created by the impact of the aircraft is what caused the collapse and not the fire, then surely you could agree that the force impacts the constraints keeping the tower stable. In short, the constraints don't just disapear. They still exist What you should see in the event of a collapse is the affected constraints failing and the partially unaffected constraints maintaining themselves. We actually designed high-rise buildings these ways way before the 9/11 attacks.

2018-10-22 08:59:26 UTC  

That’s the fishy bit, and I’ll completely agree there. But the north and south towers were going to fall, the momentum of aircraft is the cause, the structure was weaken burning jet fuel, will set alight to other materials, their might not be enough to melt the steel but there is enough to get it a point malleable causing the collapse.

2018-10-22 09:00:23 UTC  

Oh cool, 9/11 conspiracies

2018-10-22 09:00:25 UTC  

Mad do you have any literature to support that position? I’d be interested to read it. I agree with starfoxxs post

2018-10-22 09:03:28 UTC  

A type jet Fuel burn to produce a heat of 2500K, standard steel metals at 2500K. But A Type jet fuel burns really violently, it just wasn’t enough. This assuming that steel is normal steel and not an alloy and the fuel in the aircraft was A type.

2018-10-22 09:03:43 UTC  

Not on hand no. I am sure you can do your own research however, you're at a computer. Besides, you never seen a high rise fire before? Theres been much worse incidents of high rise fires. Not only that, if you don't think we design our high rise buildings with planes in mind then all I can say is please don't work in highrise lol. All that weight and force has to go somewhere, constraints don't just get delete. Demolitions explain this too, theres a reason we plant explosives into the constraints of a building, each floor in. It's so that we can produce that collapse into itself effect.

2018-10-22 09:04:51 UTC  

You believe in the explosives theory, then?

2018-10-22 09:05:43 UTC  

Steel doesn't have to melt to deform

2018-10-22 09:06:05 UTC  

No I believe in the physics explained in structural failure explanation

2018-10-22 09:06:40 UTC  

I do not know, what I do know is that basic routines were ignored entirely after these buildings collapsed.

2018-10-22 09:06:54 UTC  

I'm actually surprised they didn't collapse just from the crash

2018-10-22 09:07:31 UTC  

How do you know are demolitions expert, or are you making claims our your ass

2018-10-22 09:08:22 UTC  

@Ondsinet I said the same thing

2018-10-22 09:08:56 UTC  

Shut up goys and get with the programme. In this rare case, the mainstream narrative has no real evidence to deny it

2018-10-22 09:09:04 UTC  

Structural engineering, it works.

2018-10-22 09:09:18 UTC  

Myself? Simply because I have informed myself on such things. I've looked into it and many experts have revealed this- what you seriously don't think they do not investigate why a building collapsed? We have to do that kind of thing to ensure these incidents do not repeat. It's the way we improve structural engineering.

2018-10-22 09:09:51 UTC  

@starrfoxx123 how fast and heavy is a plane like that?

2018-10-22 09:10:19 UTC  

On a scale from a victorias secret model to amy schumer

2018-10-22 09:10:57 UTC  

Ok I could agree with that madxombat. We should compare the collapses to other times buildings were hit by planes. Specifically, 100 story buildings

2018-10-22 09:11:43 UTC  

Oh that’s never happened before in the history of man? Surprising

2018-10-22 09:11:44 UTC  

If 9/11 is so good, why don't we have 9/11 two? Plz mr FBI I'm joking don't kill me

2018-10-22 09:13:23 UTC  

Believe all women

2018-10-22 09:14:02 UTC  

Boeing 767s way 176 tons. They would have been travelling as fast as possible to allow for maximum damage meaning the momentum of the impact is FUCKING INSANE

2018-10-22 09:14:06 UTC  

But if I want to transition to woman without any operation or effort, do you believe me?

2018-10-22 09:15:55 UTC  

Of course I would ondsinet

2018-10-22 09:15:56 UTC  

Not mention they would like be using the most vigorous fuel A type because it’s the best turbo fan jet engines. The “explosion” on impact is the vaporisation of the fuel in the wing tanks. It wouldn’t produce a large pressure wave

2018-10-22 09:16:41 UTC  

If you have any knowledge of physics you understand starfoxx is speaking truth

2018-10-22 09:17:11 UTC  

god I wish I didn't have garbage internet

2018-10-22 09:17:36 UTC  

You guys are aware of what happened in 1945 right?

2018-10-22 09:18:15 UTC  
2018-10-22 09:19:23 UTC  

A nuke is massive explosion in a league COMPLETE different

2018-10-22 09:19:35 UTC  

Not talking about Nukes

2018-10-22 09:19:58 UTC  

Kamikaze are quite smaller if you are talking about that

2018-10-22 09:20:46 UTC  

Slowmode gay also when do I level up