Message from @ConceptHut
Discord ID: 506723733864710144
No idea what you said.
Sorry
Hold on
(note: I'm a mech engineer)
Edited
To quote a philosophy major from my school
“You can’t prove that he even exists”
So how are you supposed to prove the lever is exerting x amount of force
That statement is wholly irrational.
If you can’t even prove the lever exists
You can argue you perceive the lever
But that doesn’t necessarily mean it exists
When someone introduces a statement like that, the value of the conversation is as useful as trying to teach calculus to a brick wall.
NOTE: I will not attempt to teach a brick wall calculus.
What I’m saying is
I know what you are saying.
Alright
It's a poor line of reasoning.
Also congrats on the rank up
From a “proving” standpoint though, it’s a perfectly solid line of reasoning
```NOTE: I will not attempt to teach a brick wall calculus.```
alright, that's your choice
like @Cirno said, "philosophy is not something that can be proven through something scientific"
I was not attempting to prove philsophy through science. That should have been obvious by the statements I made.
I know
I'm agreeing
dont need murder to be proven immoral. it's unethical.
Shifting the word from moral to ethical does nothing but change the letters to the same concept.
im not concerned with morals because theyre subjective
Then murder is acceptable.
can you "prove" anything is immoral?
Yes.
The question is, can you.
no, it's unethical which makes it unacceptable. objectively it causes harm to others
That is the purpose of the conversation from the start.
You may want to review the definition of ethical vs definition of moral.
its a dumb question, im not here to humor you
I'm not here to agree with you or humor you.
I find your replies to be dumb.
So now we are feeling the same.