Message from @🌻 togepi 🌻

Discord ID: 507425861293572099


2018-11-01 05:25:55 UTC  

but god said to

2018-11-01 05:25:57 UTC  

it's in the bible

2018-11-01 05:26:04 UTC  

it is a Judicial law

2018-11-01 05:26:17 UTC  

ipso facto not objective morality

2018-11-01 05:26:21 UTC  

I just asked if you know the difference

2018-11-01 05:26:35 UTC  

"Shit, how do we get around this contradiction in our code", "I know, we can say it is under a different law system", "yeah, that totally makes fucking sense".

2018-11-01 05:27:03 UTC  

@HungBunny okay so lying is fine then, never confront people on their shit, just lie to people and if anyone says you're slime for it they're meany stupid heads. Bugger off.

2018-11-01 05:27:04 UTC  

Well im sorry my school didnt use the same terminology yours did

2018-11-01 05:27:30 UTC  

ok

2018-11-01 05:27:37 UTC  

That is the point

2018-11-01 05:27:50 UTC  

"stoning the gays" is not a part of the moral law of the bible

2018-11-01 05:27:51 UTC  

@Roarey How is he lying? What you're asking for is proof of God which isn't an easy thing for the average person yo articulate

2018-11-01 05:27:57 UTC  

If you wont concede that the bible says to stone the gays, there are plenty more to pick from

2018-11-01 05:28:05 UTC  

@HungBunny You've missed a lot.

2018-11-01 05:28:13 UTC  

i never said it did not say that

2018-11-01 05:28:29 UTC  
2018-11-01 05:28:40 UTC  

just that it was part of the cerimonial/judical law not the moral law

2018-11-01 05:28:53 UTC  

That literally doesn't matter.

2018-11-01 05:29:07 UTC  

@HungBunny it is an act of deception to not answer basic questions and instead dodge and weave around them. It is a lie of omission because he is omitting stating his beliefs honestly and openly to avoid the embarrassment of being contradicted, of having his argument easily picked apart.

2018-11-01 05:29:08 UTC  

i came in here thinking it was a philosophy argument but now I've realized it's not @HungBunny

2018-11-01 05:29:12 UTC  

It's part of the teaches that all fit so nicely into your objective morality

2018-11-01 05:29:32 UTC  

Because the rest of the world doesn't fucking care if it's so called, "moral law" or "judicial law". They care about, does it say to do these two contradictory things.

2018-11-01 05:29:35 UTC  

and yes, yes it does.

2018-11-01 05:29:41 UTC  

Let me ask you this: Is it morally wrong to perform homosexual acts?

2018-11-01 05:29:45 UTC  

yes

2018-11-01 05:29:52 UTC  

Why?

2018-11-01 05:29:58 UTC  

because it is against the natural law

2018-11-01 05:30:02 UTC  

AND?

2018-11-01 05:30:03 UTC  

Well I think we've got all we need

2018-11-01 05:30:12 UTC  

It isn't a lot to ask someone who is claiming something exists to just explain what it is they're saying is existing and how they arrived at that conclusion. For the love of fuck.

2018-11-01 05:30:15 UTC  

What's the natural law

2018-11-01 05:30:33 UTC  

a body of unchanging moral principles regarded as a basis for all human conduct.

2018-11-01 05:30:44 UTC  

natural law is what increases population the fastest

2018-11-01 05:30:50 UTC  

Why can't two dudes bang

2018-11-01 05:30:52 UTC  

that you subjectively choose to follow.

2018-11-01 05:31:02 UTC  

so weve got moral, law, natural law, cerimonial law, judicial law, and civil law
would you like to add any?

2018-11-01 05:31:23 UTC  

How about my law-ng cock.

2018-11-01 05:31:28 UTC  

Bollock law

2018-11-01 05:31:29 UTC  

it depends

2018-11-01 05:31:30 UTC  

which ones do you actually have to follow?

2018-11-01 05:31:46 UTC  

increasing population and killing non believers is the only thing natural law is good for