pseudo bourgeoisie materialists

unite the right

how am i basically a strasserite supposed to work with someone like spencer

i can't keep my mouth shut forever i don't hate him because he is rich its the materialist class signaling which is a straight up (((capitalist))) invention

a virtue of a man is to be honest and also to accept criticism is another

by not pointing out flaws where they lay is only saying it is ok

Twp is very Strasserite the long knifes night didn't go so well for them they cared more for socialism than nationalisn

work for an ethnostate

then after we can argue about that

or we work for our slice of the pie while they work for an ethnostate

if either side wins we win to some degree

If we all work hard enough, we can make the white ethnostate a reality.

person "X" has the latest trendy clothes, listens to the newest modern music that just came out, has the same haircut as the next guy to be cool, same popular glasses who could i be describing?

Hitler was very social. To him, national and social are the same idea.

88

Strasser was willing to betray Hitler to push things to Bolshevism.

^

The church wouldn't exist under Strasser.

and he paid for that mistake.

I didnt know that

Yeah totally which is why he talked hitler out of suicide

Interesting

and i don't buy the none church thing for a second

The Bolshevik ethos is Jewish.

Yea it is

They killed millions of Christians.

strasserism is natsoc with actual socialism

They sure did. Over 6

and meritocracy

yeah

"'National' and 'Social' are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory. That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it 'National Socialist.' We said to ourselves that to be 'national' means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, even to die for it. And similarly to be 'social' means so to build up the state and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it." - Adolf Hitler, speech of April 12th, 1922 in Munich.

"Why," I asked Hitler, "do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party programme is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited to socialism?"

"Socialism," he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, pugnaciously, "is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.

"Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.

"We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one."

- Interview of Adolf Hitler by George Sylvester Viereck, took place in 1923. It was republished in Liberty magazine in July 1932.

"You cannot be a true nationalist without also being a socialist; you others cannot be true socialists without also being nationalists.

To be a nationalist means loving one's own people more than all others, and to work to be sure that it can hold its own among them. If this people is to hold its own against the rest of the world, I must wish and work for the health of each member, to see that things go as well as possible for each individual, and therefore the whole. But then I am a socialist!"

- Adolf Hitler

the socialism in natsoc was more so prussian socialism.

Yes but not just.

What's your actual complaint? Hitler made sure the lower class was uplifted and taken care of and employed fairly. More than fairly. More fairly treated overall than in ANY Bolshevik conception.

none at all

same goal different ways of acheiving so

Gregor Strasser got shot like a dog and Otto's only claim to fame is telling the jews bizarre sexual stories about Hitler post war.

Lol not really. Bolshevism is a failure.

http://ironmarch.org/index.php?/topic/6794-fascist-economics-and-socialism-of-duty/

National Socialist socialism was also socialism of duty. Redpill yourself

i know