It's real and has merit but it debatably doesn't matter

@parrott Citizens For Trump = Literal Hitler

let me finish ffs

I am lol

it's text you can't be talked over

fuck u

anyway

the original overton window is bullshit

it's not about pushing boundaries in political discourse

it's simply a matter of what you can get away with (without being ostracised, beaten up or jailed)

and as it stands, you can't get away with any sort of racism or nazism in the USA

so no, the window hasn't moved

Are we allowed to chat yet?

It's impossible to give a worldwide standard for changing political discourse. Overton window is bullshit. It's a zero sum game, either you get away with it or you don't, there isn't, shouldn't and can't be a standard for it, if you're smart, you recognize it.

For example, MP can survive hanging out with us, while posting even friatider will get you fired in Sweden: http://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/finns_party_mp_poses_with_national_socialists_at_memorial/8084384

To state that the window of acceptable discourse in public hasn't changed in the past couple years is absurd.

I've literally got multiple high school classmates liking my fashy social media posts and lamenting the refugee crisis, black crime, and Jewish bankers.

But then again, you couldn't directly link to our stuff. You have to maintain this air of plausable deniability

overton window states that public discourse changes when people start discussing increasingly extreme subjects

what happened in the US is simply a change of circumstances and issues perceived by the people

it didn't happen by gradually hammering anti-immigration talks on their ears

I was just defining it broadly by what is socially acceptable to talk about at least without being blanket-banned from the media/most people

maybe normies are a good frame of reference to use

well, yeah

You're defining it more specifically, I'm not

"ban the muslims," "end the fed," "America First," "nationalism against globalism,"... This shit wasn't allowed in public spaces a few years back.

but again what we've talked earlier makes more sense

I remember this case a True Finn representative from Vaasa was hanging out in this one skin joint, and leftist got butthurt, but he didn't get in trouble. But then another representative got a warning for posting ethnic hatefacts on FB.

people go with what is trending and with the stronger horse

What gets you in trouble and what doesn't is really ambiguous

From time to time.

Plausable deniability, that's how Plowshares into Swords can work with Actual Important People while being a raging closet nazi.

Hahah, oh yeah, and one union representative here is 3/4 open nazi, but what can they do, fire him, union representative?

Reds checkmate'd

Posts our stuff and wears stuff with iron crosses and swastikas but falls short of saying Hitler was right on his open FB.

Having people all along the way is well and good. Just as long as they're not signaling against the men to their right.

Especially if they're public men. We're all stocked up on bloggers and shit playing the entry level game.

Of course, we will never pander to anyone to the left of us, but if normies, especially those with reach wanna promote us, hell, it's all good.

Yup.

For example, you cannot and shouldn't purity test thousands of people marching, even if all of them are not nazis, it doesn't matter if they all conform to nazi leadership. Sure the march had a few low info guys like "hrh moozlems worship the moon" or something, but as long as they don't lead shit, who cares.

☝🏻 🗡 ☪

Vice versa, if a bunch of nazis are led by TRS-tiers they'll never utilize a fraction of their potential.