http://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1488219461469.webm

he takes in calls too thats the best part

one guy called in with a molyneux impression

one of the funniest things

@🅱arD Spooky

cantwell is still an-cap.. he has the flag on his set still and in the About section on his site it says he is an-cap

why is it that any time some libertarian embraces hoppean ideas that idiots say "he isn't an anarchist any more, he is super right wing"

they do the same thing to molyneux, even when he still says he is a voluntarist and that he isn't right wing

do people not have the mental capacity to realize that these things aren't mutually exclusive?

I dunno.
Anarchists are a very whiny lot, they tend to be ideology over pragmatics as an absolute rule.

doesn't really have anything to do with my complaint

Hoppe has been saying we need to remove undesirables from society for a long time (in a stateless society) on principal, this doesn't make him "right wing" or a statist

so now that molyneux and cantwell start saying things similar to hoppe, now they get called right wing and statist

Well, removing people involuntary kinda goes against voluntarism.
And while in order to assure a libertarian society it'd be a necessity, as I stated previously, anarchists are autistic and unwilling to compromise.

not against voluntarism if those people are a threat

which is not really my gripe

it's just that the purposeful mischaracterization of people's positions just to make themselves feel better about their own views, is retarded

it's time to stop.avi

Yes, but if we didn't strawman people we'd have to talk to them and end up having our fundamental views questioned.

it sounds like someone is about to launch their tomahawk missles

i don't have enough tomahawks to get rid of all of the strawman-ers

You'd have to remove almost everyone.

i just want them to stop being bad at arguments and thinking

if burnside sees this he will memacaust you again @Iamawesom

@Benzmiller People are almost always unwilling to get over themselves.

i know, but what else can i say, other than to call them retards and tell them to stop

or maybe they're unable to

Well, you can't reason a person out of somewhere they didn't reason themselves into.
But there are more advanced argument methods.

Socratic is good, make them ask questions about the fundamental nature of their ideology.

Of course this only works if the person understands the difference between a question and answer. Fact and opinion.

i'm sure they don't even understand the socratic method

No, but you can make them use it in an argument.

this is why i generally don't engage them. they can't stay on topic

That's another thing.

If you're talking about convincing people to stop supporting communist horseshit, it takes experience of the real world before they wake the fuck up. I've never known a working person who has ever supported communism.

we're not

The proliteriat don't wanna be dictators.
They just wanna have a beer with the missus.

The proles realize that it's better to be able to climb a ladder than to be stranded on the floor for life

It's pseudo intellectual middle class idiots who think they can fix the world via leveling the plane.

I don't want level, that's shit, I wanna be able to not work one day.
I want movement, thriving, life that is questioned and vibrant with a relied source of income.