```
Instead of democracy’s parliamentary system, we will have an economic parliamentof the National Socialist state. It will be chosen by the totality of the working German people. Everyone will have a vote. This election, however, will not involve parliamentary parties, but rather by the great professions within the people’s community. German professions are organized down to the smallest detail, and provide the guarantee that each working German will have the right to have his will, his accomplishments, and his responsibility taken into consideration by the state. The economic parliament will manage economic policy, not state policy.

That will be managed by the Senate. It will consist of about 200 personalities, chosen by the dictator from all groups and classes. It will lead the state. These 200 will be the elite from the whole people. They will provide the government with advice and support. They will be appointed for life. In the event of death, another will be appointed.

The senate will select the chancellor. He will have full responsibility for the whole policy of the Reich, both domestic and foreign. He will be ready to give his life for that policy if necessary.

The chancellor will choose his ministers and officials. He will also have full responsibility over them, which means he can appoint and fire them at will.

```

Interesting idea

Mind you, for the time being, a wholesale rejection of the democratic principle is our best course

I agree.

In the future National Socialist state, we can introduce elements of populism as are appropriate, but in the present, democracy is synonymous with liberalism

Heidegger explicitly said "only individuals are creative (even to lead), the crowd never"

Illiberal democracy is a thing, but it's considered the exception

One big problem I had with GLR was that he tried to fit traditionally american values in to national socialism, when the two are at odds in almost every way

So if you listen to GLR alone, which a lot of spergs do, you become confused about what fascism and NS actually is

He was right to try

His failure is why we know it can't work

reading what GLR said about how the Founding Fathers were actually Fascists makes me cringe

GLR speaks in simple terms, which makes him a good orator, but also means that a lot gets lost in translation

Yea, it is cringe. I know people who unironically think that

How you can believe that is beyond me

If a man as great as GLR couldn't make it work, then none of us will be able to

@BasedWhiteGoy to counter what you say about Heidegger, there exists the "hive mind analysis" phenomenon, where groups of people making predictions about something are usually better than an individual

Though I do think that if he hadn't been murdered, there's a good chance he would have become Governor

Fascism, intellectually, sprung from a rejection of modernity and the enlightenment. Almost every major fascist philosopher was very explicit about that

He was murdered by the fucking feds because he made so much sense

GLR failed because he was fucking assassinated.

The founders created a nation steeped in modernity

for example, it's been shown that when a bunch of people play a "guess the weight game", their answers, while varying wildly, will always average out very close to the true value

(((They))) knew GLR was redpilling too many too fast.

the same is true of other things

the problem is

of course

the mob

the effect is ruined when someone's decision making is influenced by everyone else's

which is why democracy often doesn't experience that effect

The hivemind is consistent with fascism. No one said that people wouldn't pool their collective intellect and efforts to advance the nation, in fact that is what fascism is all about

But the leader that the people elevate and will in to power gets the final say

Fascism is a sort of third way between democracy and total dictatorship. Usually a fascist dictator ought to be and is a charismatic, strong person that is beloved by the people

I can't wait for the day when I can catch a flight out of George Lincoln Rockwell Airport

There's that quote from Huey Long about how a perfect democracy almost looks like a dictatorship, where the people are so satisfied they have no complaint

Mussolini is a great example of this. Mussolini drew from Julius Caesar and italy's rich roman history to invigorate the national spirit of the italian people

Some day 😢

Caesar was, in a sense, the first example of what a fascist leader would look like

@Hadrian what annoys me about that little easter egg is that it makes zero sense in the world of High Castle

A charismatic, popular, beloved man who the people entrusted with total power