Message from @Tedium
Discord ID: 323628183989649410
Okay, just basic WN, got it.
I remember meeting a couple of them at Pikeville, seemed like good guys
Yeah I'm not shitting on anyone.
But.
Yeah I actually am shitting on the concept of colorblind fascism.
If you're not one good for you.
We aren't colorblind
I heard their leader on Radical Agenda. Seems like a alright guy, still not totally sure what to make of the group.
But non-racist Mussolini is cool?
Now here's something for you. Colorblind Fascist vs. Racist Libertarian. WHO WINS?
Is that Dillon dude still your leader?
Yeah
k
Oh wow, it still says Reaction America on the thumbnail.
Blood and soil and making corporations subservient to the state and roping the oligarchs.
Just say you're a nazi dude.
But yeah, minus lack of mentions of jews and muhfreemarket, I like it.
It mentions Jews
Oh yeah, there it is.
Good man.
Why support the (((free market))) tho
I mean, this is very minor complaint, you say you support some fascist economics there.
But yeah.
"Vanguard America stands indomitably opposed to the tyranny of globalism and capitalism, a system under which nations are stripped of their heritage and their people are turned into nothing more than units of cheap, expendable labor."
In the leader's interview with Cantwell, he said he supported "free markets" in the sense of letting people start their own companies, and trade with money. But he said it would be controlled by the government in some capacity.
Much like Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany
So, certainly not "free markets" in the Libertarian sense
I guess it's more of a semantics thing
That's what I've found
k, got confused by the (((free market is not the enemy))) bit.
It's cool.
It's just usually the people making free market into a holy cow are huge jews.
Yeah, that's definitely true.
There was this good quote about fascist economics.
"Both Capitalism and Communism seek the same: material prosperity, but one seeks it through a loosely organized competitive free for all (hence the holy cow of the free market, liberal concept of the state not meddling in economics and so on) and the latter seeks it through a collective effort which demands a unified direction (hence the form of State Socialism with control of the means of production and distribution in the hands of the State, and the stateless Communism with those same means being directly in the hands of the collective itself with no middle man).
The goal of Capitalism is ultimately to work and make profit until such a point when you don't have to work, work is an obstacle to be overcome on the path to having material wealth that can be enjoyed and thus decadence sets in. The Bourgeoisie achieved this goal to the envy of the Proletariat that decided that it was robbed of its take and thus rose up to claim that wealth for itself. It is only logical that with the advancement of technology ideas like "fully automated luxury communism" would appear, proving Spengler right: Marx hated work, making him in that sense no different from capitalists, as that scenario is the dream of every capitalist as well."
Yockey and Spengler also wrote a ton of good stuff about socialism and how criticism of communism is ultimately criticism of capitalism.
They are flip sides of the same coin.
"Hence [Marx's] hatred of those who do not need to work. The socialism of a Fichte would accuse such people of sloth, it would brand them as irresponsible, dispensable shirkers and parasites. But Marxian instinct envies them. They are too well-off, and therefore they should be revolted against. Marx has inoculated his proletariat with a contempt for work." - Speng