Newgrounds gang-gang

I can honestly see why God would save Catholics over Protestants

Not on their own, @The Eternal Swede , but if every conventional measure of normal evidence gets undermined by technology, they eventually CAN use that to argue the case for...say, state enforced DNA banks. Or tracking software.

They can use that to argue for those things already, as they know about the existence of deep fakes

Where the tech goes from here, publicity-wise, doesn't affect that very much

They can and will make whatever arguments they like, and if not these arguments, they will make other ones

I don't think the existence of deep fakes *meaningfully* affects their ability to create a deeper police state, is what I'm trying to say

We'll see if this won't be used past making porn video's about AOC

no such thing as state overreach

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don't have any numbers on it, but i'd be curious to know what are the predominant evidence methods currently used to convict criminals.

None of you believe there will be a transition period for stuff like this? People will be instantly redpilled? I dont buy it. Especially in Europe where people get convicted for tweets they cant even prove were written by them.

I bet the jews love this though, it means soon you can personify your stepmom pornhub fantasies

no people are selected by the redpill

and people like u and i will only propogate if the redpill selection machine helps with fertility and lifestyle

haha, soon™

I am Muslim ama

When will you leave our countries

does your mother make good curry?

<:basedmama:396156349676781569>

Her mother is in the curry

Hey what’s up guys

I believe global warming is a real phenomenon

Debate me

Explain how historic levels of atmospheric CO2 did not contribute towards runaway warming. Then I might consider debating.

I'm specifically talking about periods in history when atmospheric CO2 was at levels ~1500ppm

@oojimaflip can you give me one instance of this? There are different reasons for different time periods.

Carboniferous period will do. As far as I can see the contention of climate scientists is that increased atmospheric CO2 will lead, via the greenhouse effect, to Earth becomming more like Venus.

if this were true, Earth would already look like Venus.

What was the carbon dioxide ppm at that time

~1500ppm

I mean Venus has an atmosphere of 96% carbon dioxide it says I’m not sure having a atmosphere of 1500 ppm would make it turn into Venus

not in terms of atmospheric compostition, no. But that's not the contention.

What

"atmospheric CO2 levels >400ppm (current) will lead to catastrophic temperature rise."

that's the contention, is it not?

So there is a difference between these things. In ones instance the temperature gain were slower. The ecosystem is able to adapt over the 100,000 or what ever time period. 10000 years maybe. Human beings are raising co2 levels a lot more a quickly and this is why it will lead to catastrophic effects

it's also a fallacy that "Venus is hot because it's atmosphere is 96% CO2"

Venus is hot because it's atmosphere is much thicker than Earth's

Well it’s actually 2 things. It’s high co2 levels and it’s thicker atmosphere. We can observe the green house effect of co2 in experiments. High schoolers do this.

So we know co2 has this effect