you want some fantasy because it's "the right thing to do"

inj your mind

So do you

not caring aobut consequences

yes, if you legalize something, there aren't going to be as many offences related to it 😂

no

I am dealing with the world as it is

you're dealing with the world as you wish it were

Yes, because why kill eachover over a product that is now sold on the wider market? People don't buy drugs from armed thugs when given the choice.

no, because its not illegal to do or traffick in it anymore

I tell you, you can't do X, even if it was possible

then you tell me we need to do Y as well, which can't happen

No, because there are no crimes related to it, you don't need gangs or criminal orgs to traffic drugs. @Nerthulas

No armed cartels are necessary when you have no government to prohibit your product.

I dont think weaboo knows the difference between decriminalisation and legalisation and I think the chances are that what he actually stands for is decriminalisation

your solution to fantasy is literally just deeper fantasy

It's true though

Why am I wrong?

jf deleted stream );

not wrong

Better safe than sorry

the gang violence isn't what is really important, what is important is the effect on the society

legalize all drugs

These are dark times indeed

I have deleted tonight's video because although it was fair use, it has been targeted unfairly by a YouTube bot for copyright violation. I will reupload on bitchute later. This is to prevent a false strike.

Why would cartels exist if there wasn't prohibition? I mean violent cartels. Mexican cartels. Not your broad pedantic definition of a cartel.

I agree with Billy Ray but disagree with Weaboo Kempeitai

based

once again you don't know what a cartel is

@Nerthulas No effect on society when druggies are discriminated against.

I'll tell you why you're wrong, just as I did how, you have been listening to too many of these speakers, and now you're just saying back what they have said, without really thinking it through @Weaboo Kempeitai

No, I haven't.

@Weaboo Kempeitai reread your last satement

you clearly ahve

too much or too many

and or*

look at this statement

think about this for one second

think about how retarded this is