yes

All the religions seem to focus on servitude.. imo they don't teach enough about spirituality

^

All that is falls under his rule and law

Your spirit is of utmost importance

good for him

pagang is not servitude it is an exchange, a compact between man and gods

> Man is comprised of an organism, which is to say an organised form, and of vital forces, as well as a soul. The same may be said of a people. The national construction of a state, while taking account of all three elements, for various reasons of qualification and heredity can nevertheless be chiefly based upon a single one of these elements.

> In my opinion, in the Fascist movement it is the state element that prevails, coinciding with organised force. What finds expression here is the shaping power of ancient Rome, that master of law and political organisation, the purest heirs to which are the Italians. National Socialism emphasises what is connected to vital forces: race, racial instinct, and the ethical and national element. The Romanian Legionary movement instead chiefly stresses what in a living organism corresponds to the soul: the spiritual and religious aspect. -
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

Paganism is gay. The only real pagan out there is "Survive the Jive".

there's a lot of groups following recnstructive paganism, of which StJ is a part

Gauls are gay

And when you say that any religion is unlikely to be correct, you are already showed how low iq you are.

he and many do real blots and all now
didn't get to my local one because I wasn't part of the secret telegram group but they exist

WTF fix my roles

please

havent experienced evidence of a soul

You have a soul

Deciding that religion is right or wrong based off that math is pretty low IQ. That is like me saying that there is 1,000 races, hahah. that logic is very weak, sorry, trog.

You literally make assumptions you would have to answer by that logic. Can you tell me what those assumptions are?

Universalism is gay

Deport Abrahamists to Israel

dont turn it around on me, youre the one claiming detailed thing

s

I just can make a list of your assumptions right now without ever hearing this arugment

1. You assume every religion is just as probable.

2. You assume no special revelation.

Well, there arer probably more. Those are the ones I thought off the top of my head.

the more detailed the more likely youre wrong

How?

specifics of unknowables

You can the assumption of no special revelation. If you entertain special revelation, the probability difference WILL disappear.

its a memetic trick

fake evidence

>_>

'he must be right his story has such detail it cant have been made up'

😍 ✋🏻

@Tyburn got more boargang memes?