ok

then you're a liar

Just because things are subjective doesn't mean there's not any way to differentiate between actions.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/8556836/emperor-nero-3d-bust-caesar/ handsome 😍😍😍

But the boundaries are fuzzy.

d20

do you know what meaning is?

do you understand what I mean when I say meaning?

yes "meaning"

You know what thought did?

ok

so you understood it

You must choose if you will follow master or slave morality

I didn't need to describe the iimpossible for you for you to understand exactly what it meant

exactly

for you

just becasue you can't explain something perfectly doesn't mean it doesn't exist

this is way over your head

just forget

I'm too tired now anyway

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/6706431/julius-caesar-roman-empire-face-reconstruction/

what

how?

this is stupid

I alrady know you don't udnerstand what I*m saying

there is no way you have a good argument

Guys, this is a pointless discussion until you've understood the creator creation distinction.

no

that's you not understanding it

you know nothing about how I make myr easoning

you have decided it's wrong before you even heard it

making you what

dishonest

I think D20 has a point. We often want to believe in objective morality b ecause it *FEELS* like the world has to be that way, but ultimately its a cognitive illusion.

no

There's really very few acts that are objectively good or bad.

dude

you're a 16 year old kid

you don't understand wht I'm typing to you

but smugly you think you understand the argument

If I had to define an objective morality it would be based around evolutionary survival, since without survival nothing else is possible.