not really

@CryptoJack Its reactionary

Just 5 videos of Fuentes make him look worse than everything Spencer has done

My religion: https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/operation-pastorius-hitler-s-unfulfilled-dream-of-a-new-york-in-flames-a-716753.html

a mix up of theocrats

monarchistrs

clerical fascists

ancaps

It's a rejection of whig history

and thinks society has moved progressively leftward

since the Reformation

Arguably even earlier

but certainly since the Enlightenment

you have to look at society as it has been programmed and find ways around these things, running around saying hail victory just played into the leftist medias hands

It rejects many enlightenment ideals

such as democratic government

consent of the governed

etc

Thus it is given the nickname, the Dark Enlightenment

spencer poopied himself with his autism

alright cool

Spencer will never get big endorsements. Thats his issue

If you're not a groyper when you're young you have no soul. If you're not a spencerite by your 30s you have no brain.

Fuentes could get 5% of the american right through endorsements of key people

Spencer thinks if hes got the best ideology everyone is just gonna jump on board and rally behind him

Spencer could get like .01%

Let's not forget how many groypers Fuentes has blocked, the same people he now claims to be his "army"

Spencer sounds gay.

You guys dont understand Spencer.... He was never trying to create the movement around him, he was laying the intellectual/moral foundation.

And that is why I cannot consider him a leader

of anything

He's an intellectual.

Leaders can be intellectual

Fuentes isn't that intellectual

compared to Spencer

He literally did try to make a movement

Fuentes is the opposite of an intellectual.

Wtf are you talking about

but he can market himself far better

No

and Spencers ideas are kind of opposed to mine