well it wouldn't make much of a difference imo

@Chawosaurian that's the better scenario xD

Which

The degenerative monopolistic scenario?

Big Ben is back. : D

they are a state payed and by thugs influenced monopoly

at least here

if people are too lazy to revolt and establish a fair system, because it isn't economical for them to do it now, it wouldn't be in a different system either

a supply/demand deal isn't it

people just aren't demanding justice enough

Sure the monopolist may make it comfy enough for his subjects so they stay quiet

@Ozpin88 btw, did you agree with me that epistemically, race is socially constructed?

yes just as every word

👍

That doesnt really say anything about anything

the monopolist can push a bit

He has his limit

but only upto secession or revolutionary threat

yeah

Which is why its a general rule

that every ruler needs popular support on his side to rule

When talking about ethics, are you guys moral realist, nihilists, or subjectivists?

This will continue until you get some odd post-humanist realms appaer

Is Rothbard a moral realist?

but it's like, everyone in every system will push for self interest, it's not like the PDA's don't or can't erect certain barriers of entry

no more options?

than the laws that usually apply to human affairs may start disintegrating

everyone raises as much barriers they can to free-ride as much as they can

@TuerSchlossEnteiser not really, they can all fit under those three categories, all the sub categories that is.

There need to be automatic mechanisms to cull parasites

Or minimize it

yeah. well. propertarianism claims being able to do that.

and im not gonna shill

but anyway. rothbardian ethics isn't the solution lol

Hoppe improved them anyway

allowing blackmail isn't the solution 😒

I am not a propertarian but propertarianism is probably the biggest brain you can get as a libertarian.

Hoppe?

wrong

Hoppe, hoppe Reiter?

lol no