Message from @Chawosaurian
Discord ID: 669942759280345097
they have
They will just not monopolize all power
That was the mistake
its a natural monopoly, its what we have
Not really natural
and?
if it were more expedient* (economical) to have another the states can secede
And does it have to be a monopoly at all
they don't, so it's economical to keep it
Cant the judges and the security just act in a fair competitive manner
man, rothbardian ethics sucks i hate talking in it
tfw statists literally admit to committing a naturalistic fallacy
Which is the only way they will have any incentive to self-improve
i hate that you take me seriously too lol
the current judicial is pretty independent as is
lol!
Independent kek
the very top isn't
They are a state enforced monopoly
but state level, local level are
well it wouldn't make much of a difference imo
@Chawosaurian that's the better scenario xD
Which
The degenerative monopolistic scenario?
Big Ben is back. : D
they are a state payed and by thugs influenced monopoly
at least here
if people are too lazy to revolt and establish a fair system, because it isn't economical for them to do it now, it wouldn't be in a different system either
a supply/demand deal isn't it
people just aren't demanding justice enough
Sure the monopolist may make it comfy enough for his subjects so they stay quiet
@Ozpin88 btw, did you agree with me that epistemically, race is socially constructed?
yes just as every word
👍
That doesnt really say anything about anything
the monopolist can push a bit
He has his limit
but only upto secession or revolutionary threat
yeah
Which is why its a general rule