Message from @donkeykickboxer
Discord ID: 357407732334198794
Though yes, it certainly could be trying to co-opt us too
It's literally nothing, some Israelites posted Pepe memes, who gives a fuck, a ton of alt light kikes already do here.
American alt light produces much worse semitic shit, I might say
Siding with the Jew is only to one road, defeat.
I doubt it would hit us.
Get a load of this
But they are trying to co-opt the younger guys, who are less woke on the kikes.
@Kombat-Unit What sexual repression is considered harmful by you?
You are free to try and learn Hebrew and co-opt the israeli youth
>Jewing the Jew
Good luck
@Arcturus The Goebbels article "More Morality, Less Moralism!" explains it pretty well. TL;DR Oppressing fags - good, but harming white race like shaming people for white kids out of wedlock or joining a monastery and not breeding at all. And then general, useless prudish behavior.
"Things have gone so far that this company of moralists does not stop at the borders of private life. They would love to establish purity committees in cities and the countryside that would keep on eye on Müller’s and Schulze’s love and marriage life. It is true that they do not want to go so far as to ban kissing altogehter, as in the familiar operetta, since it is too popular a pastime. If it were up to them, however, they would turn National Socialist Germany into a wasteland of muttering and complaining, a place where denunciation, spying, and extortion were the order of the day.
These same moralists often turn to government offices with the request to ban films, plays, operas, and operettas, since the dancers, stars, etc., apparently represent a grave danger to public decency. If we gave in to their demands, we should soon see only old ladies and men on the screen or the stage. The theaters would be empty, since the public generally does not attend them to see the same people they see in church or old people’s homes.
Save us from these hypocritical creatures who have no genuine strong conception of life, and who in reality preach no honest morality. They generally are life’s losers, protesting life itself. Eternal life and its laws will hardly make way for them; at most, they will hide behind a screen of contemptible hypocrisy and dishonest prudery."
Yeah, I'm going to have to disagree. Kids out of wedlock is a bad idea. Casual sex is pretty damned bad too if not worse. Men dedicating themselves to work has its place, and should the general birth rate be improved it really isn't as much an issue.
Should Hitler have had a kid I'm unsure if he could have dedicated himself to his nation as much as he did, which is akin to being a monk in the modern sense.
Dedicating yourself to work and having a family aren't mutually exclusive. Adolf Hitler is one of a kind. That was just an example though, just saying there are many legitimate reasons not to get married in 2017.
"Are we living in a pietistic state, or in the age of life-affirming National Socialism?
No one can suspect us of wanting to live lives of ostentation or luxury. The Führer and many of his close comrades neither smoke nor drink nor enjoy sumptuous living. Those, however, who want to rob a nation of sixty million of every pleasure and all traces of optimism are contemptible, entirely aside from the fact that their foolish desires would drive countless people into poverty and misery."
If you dedicate yourself to work to such a degree you may as well not have a family as you'd be neglecting them.
Well, what kind of marriage are we talking about? I don't necessarily care if it's the legally binding form of marriage we currently have, something like a common law marriage is fine in my book if you don't want to open yourself to as much risk. It's still a marriage in my eyes despite not being sanctioned by the state.
I'm fine with that, but many would not consider that a "real" marriage.
Well, that's how they had been prior to the government getting involved in the last century or so as I recall
Yeah?
Couldn't say, here the wedding ceremony was made mandatory for the marriage to be recognized in 1612.
I was talking more about the state license part
Innocentius IV recognized pagan marriages though provided the couples converted to christianity afterwards.
For the US at least, I think that only came about within the last century or so
Yeah, couldn't tell about your system.
Ok my question sry
So your normie friend you start to red pill her and she starts fucking you because your an alpha facist and he's a cuck who hasn't hit it in 9 months are you a degenerate
...
Asking for a friend
A bit, yeah.
You can try to justify it however you want, but cuckolding guys isn't a good thing, nor is casual sex.
I feel a few sentences got mashed into one there.
It did your normie finds wife
Jesus christ man
Super feminine closet case fag
If the relationship is as bad as you make it out to be, they'll break up eventually. Go after her then.
How does not hitting it for 9 months in a marriage work.
Got heart probs and she takes care of him if she leaves he will kill himself already tried