Message from @Skellington
Discord ID: 671509080157716531
kind of i guess. im just saying that a corrupt institution would do what is profitable
A corrupt institution might also do what is unprofitable too. Would you like an example of for profit institutions going against their profit motive for corrupt ideological reasons?
I go to work to make a profit. My work pays me to work because they derive more value than they pay me. We both profit and nothing is inherently corrupt about that arrangement.
>furry
>catholic
Pick one
because fuck you degenerate
>As long as a furry is a good Catholic
Aye, but there's the rub
Bestiality is banned in the bible so yiff in hell
Not even a christian but still
Romans 13: 3. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. 4. For the one in authority is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God's servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience. 6. This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. - Bible Offline
+votd
+votd
that's metal af
I still like how KJV sounds, fight me.
Not to you Norik but to the other King James haters.
Yea
Not trad enough
I thought Catholics were not fans
They aren't because I dosent include their books
which books are catholic?
Because Martin Luther needed to make sure that his bible supported his theology.
There's actually an account where, after homily where he denied the efficacy prayers for the dead since "it wasn't in the scripture," Luther was confronted by a Catholic who pointed out the logic for prayers for the dead spelled right out in Maccabees.
Suffice to say, Luther's next edition did NOT include those books
🤷♂️
Lmao
Wouldn't you need to swap both
no
Gnostics aren't paarticularly pleased about god/the demiurge
Either version goes depending on how you look at idea of predestination in each of them.
Doesn't calvinistic idea of predestination make sacrifice of Jesus Christ on a cross completely pointless?
it makes morality pointless
if you arent responsible for your actions
then it cant be said that you did anything wrong
thats why you dont call animals or women evil
> thats why you dont call animals or women evil
😏
That doesn’t sound too predestined to me