Message from @Argent7771
Discord ID: 672918633013575711
I dont even know what social conservativism means
I was raised by Catholic conservative parents so a bunch of my beliefs were inspired by my family and religion
That said Ive hung around different types of people and social media and seen random articles and stuff here and there
I found this place in particular cuz I met Techpriest through another fandom and we just happened to have similar enough views and I was interested in a full poltical server
But given how social media is mostly... Non-conservative these days it was difficult to find a good one so I got the recommendation
Nice.
Well you're going free my friend.
Everyone here in my experience are very nice.
And are great sources for new content and learning more idea's.
@NowItsAngeTime👉 👌 how old are you
30
Ok
Very briefly social conservatism is about not being a massive faggot
^redpilled
TO be more serious in a sense its changing the way you look at the world
I guess I would define social conservatism personally as looking at history and seeing what worked and didn't work in various historical societies and using this to uncover natural law and to try and base policies around it
I see it as an organic and empirical worldview
like the vast majority of Christian idea's are also practical
Machiavelli.mp4
Literally every sucessful society in history has had a nuclear family
the only exceptions are random throwbacks
That’s just empiricism though. That’s what the American founders were doing but I wouldn’t label them as conservative
Extended family varied in importance but the idea of a man and women raising children was always the norm
Since they were radically changing things and overthrowing established institutions
really
but its the closest term to what I belive
Yeah no I totally agree with you in your worldview
To my knowledge I don't think anyone seriously proposed gay marriage prior to the 1960's
Dennis Prager called it the single most radical idea in human history
But I feel like conservatism has an inherent respect for established institutions
By definition
it was the only political/moral idea that he could find no historical precedence for
But like if its such a great thing why did literally no one think of it before the 1960s
respect for the environment is in the bible
inb4 some dishonest loser points to that one couple in medieval Spain or some misinterpreted Indian tradition
not abusing animals is n the bible
and in other traditions
we are in a better material position to do some of these but like St. Francis tried to get the Emperor to enact animal welfare laws
Slavery being wrong is not a new idea either
Zoroastrianism condemns slavery
Transsexualism is probably more radical in terms of its social impact tbh
I guess you could find plenty of historical precedent for people acting like the other sex
But the idea of castrating yourself of your own volition to become a woman is fucking insane and unthinkable until like five minutes ago
I’d say that’s far more revolutionary (and dangerous overall) than faggots doing their thing