Younger generations tend to not be as susceptible to it though

@transience @transience https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0d7dd01ecd57761078d50e3715a565829e381dde/361_218_2902_2174/master/2902.jpg?w=1920&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=6666ed7a2dbb276643e653717c7c39b9

http://radio.garden/live/beijing/chinese-classical-music/
Have some chill chinese radio

text is readable but too fuzzy

hurts to try and read <:thonk:288060975775612929>

its translated online somewhere

@transience even with Open Original?

@Tribit THE FOREIGNER

???

I KNOW WHO HE LOOKS LIKE

OF COURSER

IT MAKES SENSE

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/104/571/4e5.jpeg

vid about chink shit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_PhIGeiA7M

@Transience#0182 those guys can't chink the chinks

what a pair of noobs

Just learned that there's a law that **requires** testing shit on animals.
unironically kys Cheena

Testing what?

medical shit or just everything?

animal testing is a good thing

t. never had a pet

If you lack basic compassion to say that, might as well offer your moms ass for chemicals testing.

animal testing is a good thing as long as its done after initial laboratory evaluation and testing

you do know that test animals are breed for that and only for that. They have no survival instincts nor such to kick in if released to wild only way to end it would be kill the animals

>breed for that

Here we go again.

example the generic "white lab rat" has somewhat thicker skin and are breed to be healthy

and i bet they get 100x better and more suitable diet and living conditions when they are not being tested

than your average "pet"

same goes with human trials

healthy very targeted audience with proper health checks done first

but i agree

that its wrong if its done cause of some makeup/shampoo reasons

for medical testing i understand and agree with it

I feel like we're talking about different things.

I don't really care how they bred or shit like that. They're still living beings that go through suffering and abuse because of that shit.

And it's not like we're in fucking 19th century anymore. I believe there are plenty of ways to avoid that. Forcing animal testing by a fucking law -- this is utter bullshit.

we dont have proper ways of testing how living tissue reacts to X and Y

other than using said living tissue

If there are cruelty free companies out there I don't really get what prevents others to adopt the same testing methods.

in this case whole organism is needed to spot possible side-effects

you know that those labels "not animal tested"

is just outsourced to companies who provide separe chemicals and minerals who do testing

but the product itself is not tested on animals

just cause no need when indegrients (what are calculated not to be reactive with each other) are tested by companies who sent them to that company