They're saying they're the future of the right l m a o

Standard oil was the company owned by John D rockefeller. He'd pioneered a new method of the production of Oil where instead of paying say for instance a moving company to move the product, or a limber company for limber, he bought all the companies involved or at least the means to produce the product

It took the presidency of Teddy Rossevelt to end his stranglehold on American Oil. Even after that the Rockefellers are massively wealthy family to this day

They screwed over an entire industry, got rewarded for it, and they're still living like kings

Capitalism is kiked

It sounds like he found a way to produce oil more efficiently

So efficiently he cornered the market

Without any involvement from the government

Why shouldn't the most efficient corner the market?

That's not a monopoly

The competition wasn't efficient

But it was a monopoly. He was the only one who could offer the product for the price he could

And as a result the competition ceases to exist

The word monopoly was coined around this time because of companies like standard oil my man

Why is it the consumers fault for buying the best price available?

Redpill yourself about NS economics: http://ironmarch.org/index.php?/topic/6794-fascist-economics-and-socialism-of-duty/

Nobody is blaming the consumer

We're blaming government for not stepping in

The consumer often has no choice but to buy the cheapest product. They have no guilty in this

A monopoly only exists if it prevents competition from entering the market. Monopolies only exist because of the government

Standard Oil prevented other companies from entering the makret

That's simply not true

This argument is getting really circular

Lots of people pay more for "made in America" products. If I lived in a white ethnostate I would buy products made locally

If you could afford to

https://dailystormer.ws/libertarianism-and-marxism-the-twin-offspring-of-liberalism/

This is a great article as well

If you discover a way to make a product 100x cheaper than the next competitor, and you keep that production method to yourself, you're monopolizing the industry

Yeah I feel like we're seeing diminishing returns in this conversation

If I lived in the 1900s and had the resources to buy land & dig for oil, how would the Rockefeller prevent that?

You wouldn't be able to sell the oil for enough to make it worth your while

Offering you a ridiculous sum of money to not do it and give you the oil

And what Fevs says. Your prices could not compete with his in the first place

You would not own the timer companies, the truck companies. etc

If it can't compete then he deserves to have a 90% market share. It's what the consumer wants

And from there he can exploit the consumer

^

Without any recourse from the consumer

Government is the only recourse

He holds that 90% market share until everybody else is driven out of business

Between Apple and Samsung, they probably have 90% market share on smartphones . There are alternatives but they have this massive market share because it's what people want

Then skyrockets the price