Big if true.

"That said, it’s also strange for people to imply that the National Socialists in Germany were not violent. Hitler personally lead his SA into battle beating up communists during the 1920s. There is absolutely nothing “Hollywood” about righteous and necessary violence committed in the exaction of justice

It’s a sad state when wannabe aristocrats condemn Aryan warriors for being violent. These critics will keep raising the bar for when it’s acceptable, as if we have to wait until there is huge hierarchical centralized command structure to give us orders before we are allowed to fight the enemy.

This of course will be impossible until we win, and we can’t win if we don’t survive. And to survive the coming struggles, we will have to fight, because the Jews very soon are going to escalate their tactics to the next level, and start trying to kill us in the street. This has already happened.

Mostly the whining charge of “Hollywood Nazism” comes down to weaklings and ninnies who don’t like the tone here for emotional reasons, and are grasping at straws to express their displeasure. They prefer stuffed up conservatives in 3 piece suits writing 9,000 word essays nobody cares about but that use lots of ten-dollar words, because these things do not challenge them or push them outside their own comfort zone.

In my personal experience, the people I’ve seen attack Daily Stormer as “Hollywood Nazis” have nothing but scorn and slander for the National Socialists of the 1930s.

The “Hollywood Nazism” charge is thus just a cudgel used disingenuously. Not only is it objectively false for the above reasons, but those who make the charge do so underhandedly."

you think it's fine to act as negroes act? Rockwell's NSWPP, Pierce's NA, even the SA of the NSDAP conducted themselves differently than how you're suggesting. Being rough-and-tumble is a far cry from animalistic and simplistic behavior. Not all actions are of the same caliber or quality; it's what separates us from the non-White races. Behavior and how one carries oneself is crucially important. It's why I don't like any of those gothic subcultures or juggalo culture or homosexuals who otherwise behave (relatively) normally. It all counts. I'm not against the lower classes, and i have respect for the SA. But they were not degerates and didn't cover themselves in tattoos

http://ropeculture.org/2016/08/30/character-vs-intellectualism/
http://ropeculture.org/2016/05/06/anti-intellectualism/

I really recommend these articles.

it instinctively repels people just like blue hair and piercings do

I dream of the day when the word intellectual is universally recognized as a term of abuse in the movement.

Liking thicc nazi goths is simplistic and animalistic behavior?

Traditionalist Animal Party

i can't believe saying dress nicely and maintain a sense of decency is considered subversive. Yeah, i'm not sure reveling in sexuality is a good thing. It doesn't feel right.

I take it you're not a big fan of NSBM and the like.

i'm not trying to reinvent the wheel here. i'm saying that these behaviors are neither the best nor the most socially healthy. Encouraging licentiousness in any capacity is just as bad as seemingly "normal" homosexuals doing their thing. It's not healthy. No that's not really my genre of music. i prefer anthems, marches, and some power metal but that's really it

How old are you, completely out of curiosity.

22

Shit man, I would have guessed 40 or something.

What does licentiousness have to do with NSBM though.

You can be a Nazi and have fun and bants around. You don't have to be a social void.

i'll be impressed if you can explain how sharing pictures of goth "Nazi" girls and hypersexualizing them is somehow more wholesome than blue hair and someone saying "vote yes!" to the australian plebiscite or whatever it is (my point is that the latter is *not wholesome*, but normies can't see how it's not wholesome because they think it's all based on "love" and "pleasure" and "it doesn't hurt anybody")

Yeah I'm all for having fun however there is a lot I just can't take seriously

Sure.

Gotta draw a line between movement and subculture

i don't think sharing pictures of girl's behinds is what would have been tolerated in NS Germany. It isn't even a representation of normal sexuality, but a subculture. i think it's hypocritical to call out the homosexuals who otherwise act relatively normal and then share "goth" girls covered in tattoos. it oozed judaism

It doesn't really have anything to do with the genre, hell, even WLP promoted NSBM. Sharing pics doesn't make a sodomite, lmao dude. I don't know what you do with friends, but you gotta have some life outside of politics, and this is what guys bantz about among themselves, except maybe in some high falutin aristocratic larp session.

And I really love you brought that up.

why's sodomy bad in your opinion?

I don't talk about women's asses with my friends

I didn't come here to bantz

"Things have gone so far that this company of moralists does not stop at the borders of private life. They would love to establish purity committees in cities and the countryside that would keep on eye on Müller’s and Schulze’s love and marriage life. It is true that they do not want to go so far as to ban kissing altogehter, as in the familiar operetta, since it is too popular a pastime. If it were up to them, however, they would turn National Socialist Germany into a wasteland of muttering and complaining, a place where denunciation, spying, and extortion were the order of the day.

These same moralists often turn to government offices with the request to ban films, plays, operas, and operettas, since the dancers, stars, etc., apparently represent a grave danger to public decency. If we gave in to their demands, we should soon see only old ladies and men on the screen or the stage. The theaters would be empty, since the public generally does not attend them to see the same people they see in church or old people’s homes.

Save us from these hypocritical creatures who have no genuine strong conception of life, and who in reality preach no honest morality. They generally are life’s losers, protesting life itself. Eternal life and its laws will hardly make way for them; at most, they will hide behind a screen of contemptible hypocrisy and dishonest prudery."
- Joseph Goebbels

@CatoHostilius Honestly, never?

No

Never in your life?

Before I became redpilled I might've

i want to know why he considers sodomy between consenting adults (something i consider morally reprehsible) to be fine, but bantering about asses is just fine. i want to know, otherwise it seems like hypocrisy

Jesus, where am I.

i base my beliefs on what is socially harmful. Goebbels was right, but i believe you're misinterpreting him

Do I even have to dignity asking why sodomy isn't equal to heterosexuality with a response?

#AryanRumpNationalism

you're implying you don't have a response. my response is that both are bad because both are psychologically unhealthy

Do you have a sexuality?

Elaborate why thicc girls equal sodomy.