Message from @HURR DURR ROCKY TOP
Discord ID: 432354041591365644
We implemented a democratic process to avoid political violence, if people are advocating political violence to reach their goals, something isn't right there. It's the paradox of tolerance, we aren't tolerant without limit, the limit is advocating political violence for a radical minority opinion.
Democracy is political violence for the majority opinion though.
That's true, but I don't see a viable alternative to enforcing majority opinion. Much different than enacting violence for a minority opinion.
Majority opinion isn’t always desirable for enforcement.
Being a really good wire puller does not a good political governor make
"it should be the goal of any peace loving society to have a population feel safe enough that they see no reason to have weapons, however it should than also be the duty of every citizen within that society to seek to defend the peace the have created"
"maybe maybe maybe"
"actually"
on peut aller loin avec des si
@Chépakoi true
"only those who disagree are idiots" is not an argument
but unfortunate
The main issue is consent, a fangirl is very different from an employee
@HURR DURR ROCKY TOP still using google translate?
@Chépakoi nope, I thought that was a saying
The fangirl/fanboy has a choice to be a fan or not, the employee has to make money.
Eh ben, Ellen comprend le français
wait are we now saying he raped them?
wat jail?
If he had consent, and they were past the age of consent, who was wronged? Do women not have the mental capacity to consent or not?
Are we claiming that fame can override a persons ability to consent?
@PrincipledLiberal I don't think he had consent but if he didn't lay a finger on them, if he didn't verbally abuse them, who was wronged?
she shouldn't fear damaging the social relationship; he did it already when the dick came out.
asking about free will ; are you leading us down the coercion route?
putting a gun to me head and asking to choose my money or my life -- is *not* a free will decision. It robs me of my liberty.
According to the "Sam Harris" definition, I would agree that it does not exist. But I don't think this is a useful definition. The more relevant question is does moral agency exist, which I think certainly exists.
compatiblist / determinist / fatalist ; I know none of these terms.
The common use of the term "free will" is talking about moral agency, philosophers confuse the issue by using "free will" in the deterministic sense.