Heimbach has always been the biggest Nice Guy National Socialist. But if you believe whites have a right to exist, to the jews and reds it equals to wanting to drown and oven 12,000,000 jewish toddlers. No way around it.

If you're a member of The Traditionalist Worker Party, and you're not following the example of conduct that Heimbach has set, then you don't understand Nationalist Socialist Values.

You don't get to act however you see fit.

You follow the rules of conduct and the example set fort by your superiors.

100%.

If you're running around screaming "Niggers and Kikes!" you might as well be a member of ANTIFA because you're hurting our movement with your degenerate behaviour.

Do you think Richard Spencer is pro-Israel? REALLY? Of course not. But he uses the argument of admiring their success as an Ethnostate because he's intelligent enough to build an argument with a concrete foundation.

NO one would be listening to him if he was screaming Kikes every time a Bloomberg reporter coughed.

What argument regarding naming the jews are you exactly making?

Enoc and Cantwell yell niggers and kikes all the time and people listen to them

I'm arguing that you follow Heimbach and Spencer's strategy of naming the Jew with some degree of intellectual merit and class.

I wish it was "faith, family and freedom". Folk & family are too similar, and I'd rather be living in multicultural America than communist homogeneous Russia. But the best would be homogeneous America

Spencer's Israel arguments are fucking retarded, but luckily no one in TWP has claimed Israel is even remotely an example to follow, no matter how "clever" "4d" chess it would be.

I think Heimbach's jew naming is alright. Does Spencer even name the jew, really?

@Klutch big difference between folk and family, your family is your blood relatives and Folk is your people and traditions

I know he once referred to journalists as golems or something like that.

Cantwell is shit-throwing mongrel. Mike Enoch is likeable at the very least.

Spencer's Cville optics were top cringe as well.

Spencer absolutely names the Jew, but often in a dog-whistling method. Heimbach is more direct, but never comes off as hateful, just factual.

Yeah his we support the cops shit

Why is using Israel as justification a bad argument?

Because Israel is worst example of ethnonationalist state, enemies with all nationalists, funds the enemies of nationalists and meddles in every country of the world to bring shekels and power to the kikes.

Supporting the cops is smart. ANTIFA and The Left are OVERWHELMINGLY Anti-Law enforecement. Fascism needs the police, trust me. Did you notice at Shelbyville the responses that Law Enforecement Officers gave when you thanked them and were polite to them? They know that The Left hates them, and they're looking for an excuse to treat us like the good guys, because that's exactly what they want to do.

0/5 state would NOT emulate. Especially when we have actual examples of functioning ethnonationalist states.

Such as Japan?

>Supporting the cops is smart.
...aaaand dropped. Cops will not side with you until we hold the State. Thinking they're your buddies is extremely naive.

Japan is a much better option then the Jews

I'm not saying we emulate Israel. But using them as justification for normies has been effective for me. "Israel is for Jews, Japan for Japanese, why don't whites deserve equality?"

I was thinking more like NS germany.

The idea of using Israel as an argument is to deflect anti-semitism. It's a temporary solution but it's a sound tactic and it has its uses.

Yeah good luck getting normies to support the 4th Reich

You don't have to think that they're your friends, but treating them with respect goes a long way because it's more than what The Left is doing. Tell me I'm wrong, I'm not.

Most normies are lost al ready we are National Socialists just the name National Socialist turns them off

There's literally nothing wrong with antisemitism. Holding Israel up as an example of what to emulate validates antisemitism whining and its really lying, no one of us wants to emulate it and we hate it, as do all sane nationalists.

If we were after as wide normie appeal as possible, we could just join GOP or something.

Hitler's rise to power was not as in your face as some of you may believe. He won because he was intelligent and he played the field as a likeable populist.

Kombat, I didn't suggest we emulate Israel. I said we should use them as justification. No one can say why Jews deserve their own ethnostate but whites don't

>Tell me I'm wrong, I'm not.
You don't have to go out of your way to be a dick, just keep in mind that antifas are a fucking joke, its the cops who hold the ultimate power to outlaw your movements and imprison your comrades. The more powerful you become, the more they will crack down on you, look at Europe.

Cops enforce the law, they don't hold the power to outlaw your movement. That would be the legislators at local, state, and federal government.

Also. I've been to Israel. It's a pretty successful country. Probably due to the fact they get billions in "aid" from white goyim, but still, it was a nice country. Antisemitism is unpalatable to the masses and it's not helpful in achieving our goals

" When National Socialism desired to hold meetings in certain parts and the labour unions declared that their members would resist, then it was not these blackmailers that were arrested and gaoled. No. Our meetings were forbidden by the police. Yes, this organ of the law had the unspeakable impudence to advise us in writing to this effect in innumerable instances. To avoid such eventualities, it was necessary to see to it that every attempt to disturb a meeting was nipped in the bud. Another feature to be taken into account in this respect is that all meetings which rely on police protection must necessarily bring discredit to their promoters in the eyes of the general public. Meetings that are only possible with the protective assistance of a strong force of police convert nobody; because in order to win over the lower strata of the people there must be a visible show of strength on one's own side. In the same way that a man of courage will win a woman's affection more easily than a coward, so a heroic movement will be more successful in winning over the hearts of a people than a weak movement which relies on police support for its very existence.